SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 20537

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
INTEGRAL TRADING AND LOGISTICS – Appellant
Versus
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY (VPA) – Respondent


Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in annulling vide the Order No. IM and EE/EQ-3 O and M/2025- 26-1081 dated 19.02.2026 and the consequential action of the respondents in issuing a fresh tender notification issued in Tender NO.60/2025-26/IM and EE/MOF/EQ-3 O and M dated 20.02.2026 including receipt of bids or award of contract as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to award the contract bearing tender No.54/2025- 26/IMEE/MOF/EQ-30 and M Dated 22.12.2025 in favour of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.VEMA RAMANJANEYULU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.RAVITEJA PADIRI

The Court made the following:

COMMON ORDER:

The respondents issued notification inviting tenders for three procurements. The petitioner has participated in all the three tenders and his tenders were rejected. Challenging the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top