SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 20553

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NYAPATHY VIJAY
PENNABADI AMARANATH REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Memo.No.GAD03-NTFORT(GR1)/2022-GRP-1 (Comp.No. 1866514), Dt. 16.08.2024 issued by the 2nd Respondent Commission as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent Commission to give effect to the opinion of the Two Member Expert Committee to conduct interview and thereafter send appropriate proposals for creation of supernumerary post if so required in terms of the Letter No.2308024/SER-A/A2l2023-2, Dt.29.02.2024 of the 1st respondent Government addressed to the 2nd respondent Commission and to take consequential proceedings for selection of the petitioner and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent Commission to reconsider the case of the petitioner in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top