HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
SHAIK CHINNA KHAJAVALI ALIAS KHAJAVALI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 13914/2026
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:20350
APHC010253552026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3331]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 13914/2026
Between:
1. S HAIK CHINNA KHAJAVALI ALIAS KHAJAVALI, S/O JUNNU SAHEB,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 3-66, NEKKALLU VILLAGE,
THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -
522237.
2. T HE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GUNTUR
DISTRICT, GUNTUR - 522004.
3. T HE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, GUNTUR DISTRICT,
GUNTUR - 522004.
4. T HE MANDAL PARISHAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, THULLUR
MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522237.
5. T HE NEKKALLU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT
SECRETARY, NEKKALLU VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL,
GUNTUR DISTRICT -522237
6. T HE TAHSILDAR, , THULLUR MANDAL, THULLUR, GUNTUR
DISTRICT - 522237
...RESPONDENT(S):
##PAGE2##Page 2 of 6
2026:APHC:20350
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of
WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 5TH Respondent in
issuing the impugned notice, dated 10-04-2026, seeking removal/demolition
of the petitioner's house consisting a small RCC daba therein admeasuring
100 Sq.yards in D.No.88, situate at Nekkallu Village, Thulluru Mandal, Guntur
District, without conducting proper enquiry, without verifying the allotment
made by the 6TH Respondent and the House Property Certificate and
without affording any reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, as illegal,
arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 21 and 300-
A of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the same and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
stay all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned notice, dated 10-04-
2026 issued by the 5TH Respondent in respect of the petitioner’s house
consisting a small RCC daba therein admeasuring 100 Sq.yards in D.No.88,
situate at Nekkallu Village, Thulluru Mandal, Guntur District and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KONDETI RANGA SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
The Court made the following order:
Heard Sri Kondeti Ranga Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri
P.Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj
and Rural Development for the respondents 1 and 3, Ms. Usha, learned
Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents 2 and 6, and
Sri Hruthik, learned counsel representing Sri M.Sudhir, learned Standing
counsel for the respondents 4 and 5.
##PAGE3##Page 3 of 6
2026:APHC:20350
2. Assailing the notice dated 10.04.2026 (Ex.P1) issued by the Panchayat
Secretary of the 5th respondent, the petitioner filed the above writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the then Tahsildar
issued a possession certificate vide Ex.P2 in favour of the petitioner’s father
for an extent of 100 square yards in Sy.No.88 of Nekkallu Village. Thereafter,
the father of the petitioner constructed a RCC building and has been residing
therein. The 5th respondent assessed the building to tax, and the petitioner
has been paying the tax. Be that as it may, a notice dated 10.04.2026 (Ex.P1)
was issued without issuing any prior show cause notice or conducting a
survey.
4. Sri Hruthik, learned counsel representing Sri M.Sudhir, learned
Standing counsel for the respondents 4 and 5, submitted the written
instructions of the Panchayat Secretary of the 5th respondent. The operative
portion reads as follows:
“It is humbly submitted that Survey No.88 is classified as Cheruvu
Poramboke (tank bed land). It
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.