Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Tuhin Kumar Gela, J
Thathamsetty Nagendra – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and statement of writ petition for passport renewal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. detailed facts regarding pending firs and procedural status of criminal cases. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. legal precedents regarding passport act and right to travel. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. court's legal reasoning on cognizance requirement for section 6(2)(f) of the passport act. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. final direction to authorities to process the passport renewal. (Para 21 , 22) |
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in not re-issuing / renewal of the Petitioner's Passport pursuant to Petitioner's Application No. VJF076628698126 purportedly on the ground of pendency of Crime No.69 of 2026 on the file of the SHO, Railway Kodur Police Station, Tirupati District against the Petitioner herein as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, irrational, contrary to the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967 besides b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
