HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Korra Sethu alias MR alias Ram – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
CRLP 4197/2026
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:22254
APHC010265782026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3396]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4197/2026
Between:
1. K ORRA SETHU ALIAS MR ALIAS RAM, S/O JAMBRI,AGED ABOUT
28 YEARS, OCC COOLIE,R/O GOSAIGONDHI VILLAGE,
TAMMINGALLA PANCHAYAT,CHINTAPALLI MANDAL, ALLURI
SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ,Rep. by its Public
Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Amaravati,(Through SHO,
Gopalapatnam Police Station,Visakhapatnam City).
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. BASIREDDY GARI SOMANATHESWARA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
##PAGE2##2
2026:APHC:22254
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.4197 of 2026
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the BNSS, has
been filed by the petitioner herein/Accused No.7, seeking regular bail, in
Crime No.225 of 2024 of Gopalapatnam Police Station, Visakhapatnam
Commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Sections
20(b)(ii)(C) read with 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances
Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the NDPS Act’).
2. Case of the prosecution is that, on 01.10.2024 at 08.00 hours at back
side of Aditya College, Near Burial Ground, Sapthagiri Junction,
Gopalapatnam, wherein the Accused Nos.1 to 5 were found in possession of
36 KGs of Ganja. On interrogation, they revealed that on the instructions of
Accused No.7 they are transporting the said contraband. The contraband was
seized under the cover of mediators report and accused persons were
remanded to judicial custody.
3. Sri B. Somanatheswara Reddy, learned Counsel for the Petitioner,
submits that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offence. The petitioner
was not arrested at the scene of offence and basing on the confession of co-
accused, the petitioner is arrayed as accused. He would further submit that
the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 08.01.2026. The petitioner is
the sole breadwinner of his family. The petitioner undertakes to abide by any
##PAGE3##3
condition that this Court may impose while granting bail to the petitioner and it
is urged to allow the petition.
4. Per contra, Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public
Prosecutor, submits that the contraband seized from the possession of
accused persons is 36 Kgs which is a commercial quantity. Statutory period of
180 days is not over. The petitioner herein is the distributor the Ganja at
Araku. Hence, prays to dismiss the petition.
5. As seen from the record, the petitioner has been in judicial custody
since 08.01.2026. The contraband seized from the possession of accused
persons is 36 KGs of Ganja which is a commercial quantity. It is submitted by
the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor that the petitioner herein is the main
distributor of Ganja at Araku and CDRs are there between the accused
persons with the petitioner. It is further submitted by the learned Assistant
Public Prosecutor that statutory period is not over.
6. The Hon’ble Apex Court in State of Kerala v. Rajesh, 2026:APHC:22254 at Paragraph
Nos.8, 19, 20 and 21 held as under:
8. To curb the spread of dangerous drugs, Parliament has
mandated that an accused under the NDPS Act cannot be granted
bail unless there are reasonable grounds to believe he is not guilty
and will not commit offences while on bail. The High Court failed to
justify ignoring these mandatory conditions when releasing the
accused. Instead of considering the grave socio-economic and
health consequences of illegal drug trafficking, the court ought to
have enforced the law in the spirit intended by Parliament.
19. Section 37 imposes additional, overriding restrictions on the
grant of bail, beyond those under Section 439 CrPC, through its non
obstante clause. It prohibits bail unless two mandatory conditions
a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.