APHC010136872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3332]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 698/2025 Between:

1. P.VASANTHA @ VASANTHI @ VASANTHAMMA,, W/O.MALYADRI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, D.NO.6-2-196, KOVUR NAGAR, ANANTAPURAM (ADHAAR NO.7564 5810 4057).

...PETITIONER AND

1. P C RAMANAIAH, S/o.Vengaiah, aged 80 years, business, R/o.D.No.299, Street No.100, Lecturers Colony, Near Water Tank, Anantapuram (Adhaar No.8076 5118 8762).

...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to modify the impugned order to the extent of not extending the status quo passed by the Learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gooty, in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3 of 2024, whereby the order dated 28.03.2024 in I.A. No. 834 of 2019 in O.S. No. 331 of 2019 was set aside without extending a status quo orders. (b) Grant an order of status quo and restrain the respondent from alienating or encumbering the suit schedule property pending final adjudication of I.A. No. 834 of 2019 in O.S. No. 331 of

2019, I.A.NO. 81/2020 by trail court, IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an order of "status quo” and restrain the respondent from alienating or encumbering the suit schedule property pending disposal of the CRP IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order as granted in CRP.No.698 of 2025 dated 19.03.2025, pending disposal of the above said Civil Revision Petition and consequently dismiss the above said revision petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. POTHAMSETTY JAYA PRAKASH Counsel for the Respondent:

1. V SURENDRA REDDY The Court made the following order:

Assailing the legality and correctness of the order dated 05.03.2025 passed in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.3 of 2024 on the file of the Court of VI Additional District Judge, Gooty, whereby the appeal was allowed and the order dated 28.03.2024 passed in Interlocutory Application No.834 of 2019 in Original Suit No.331 of 2019 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Gooty, was set aside, the present Civil Revision petition has been filed.

2. The facts that led to filing of the present Civil Revision Petition are that:

The petitioner herein is the plaintiff and respondent herein is the defendant in O.S.No.331 of 2019. The petitioner herein/plaintiff filed the said suit for Specific Performance of Agreement of sale. The plaintiff also filed I.A.No.834 of 2019, under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC, seeking temporary injunction restraining the defendant and his men from alienating the suit schedule property pending disposal of the suit. The trial Court dismissed the said application by order dated 28.03.2024. Aggrieved by said order, the plaintiff preferred CMA No.3 of 2024. The appellate Court allowed the said appeal setting aside the order passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Gooty in I.A.No.834 of 2019 and remanded to the trial Court with a direction to consider the application afresh after deciding the petition filed by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC in accordance with law. Questioning the said order, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed particularly insofar as the appellate Court declined to grant an order of status quo pending disposal of the interlocutory application.

3. Heard Sri Pothasetty Jaya Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Surendra Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in elaboration to what has been stated in the grounds of rev