HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Guda Bojjam Naidu alias Naidu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
CRLP 4098/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:APHC:21328
APHC010258572026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3396]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4098/2026
Between:
1. GUDA BOJJAM NAIDU ALIAS NAIDU, ,S/O. LATE VENKANNA, AGED
ABOUT 40 YEARS,R/O. DOMALODDU VILLAGE, BONGARAM
PANCHAYAT,PEDABAYALU MANDAL, ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Public
Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of
Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused
No.5 on bail pending disposal of Crime No.177/2025 of Kasimkota P.S.,
Anakapalli District and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
##PAGE2##2
2026:APHC:21328
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4098/2026
ORDER:
his Criminal Petition, filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNSS”), is filed by the
petitioner/Accused No.5 seeking regular bail in connection with Crime No.177
of 2025 of Kasimkota Police Station, Anakapalli District, registered for the
offence punishable under Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, “NDPS
Act”).
2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 02.08.2025 at about 1:00
PM, near Sattemma Thalli Colony Turning Junction, Kasimkota, the police, in
the presence of mediators including Revenue officials, intercepted the
accused persons while they were allegedly transporting ganja. It is alleged
that Accused Nos.1 to 5 were found in possession of 262 kilograms of ganja
packed in 131 packets and kept in seven gunny bags, which were being
transported in a Mahindra Scorpio bearing Registration No.AP 31 CU 2356,
while two of the accused allegedly acted as pilots on a TVS Jupiter Scooty
bearing Registration No.AP 40 BW 7712. During the raid, one accused
allegedly escaped. The police arrested Accused Nos.1 to 4 on the spot and
seized the contraband, four mobile phones, the above vehicles, and cash of
Rs.3,200/- under the cover of a mediators’ report. Subsequently, the arrested
accused were remanded to judicial custody on 02.08.2025. The present
##PAGE3##3
2026:APHC:21328
petitioner/Accused No.5 was arrested later and remanded to judicial custody
on 12.08.2025, and since then he has been in jail.
3. Heard Sri G. Maheswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, and
Smt. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for
the respondent-State.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent
and has been falsely implicated in the case. It is contended that no
contraband was seized from the possession of the petitioner and that,
according to the alleged confession statements of Accused Nos.1 to 4, the
petitioner merely acted as a pilot vehicle escort during the transportation of
ganja. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has been in judicial
custody since 12.08.2025 and that though the statutory period has expired, no
extension petition was filed by the prosecution. It is also contended that the
petitioner is the sole breadwinner of his family. Hence, he prayed for grant of
regular bail on suitable conditions.
5. Per contra, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed
the petition contending that the contraband involved in the present case is 226
kilograms of ganja, which is a commercial quantity under the NDPS Act. She
further submits that the investigation has been completed and charge sheet
has already been filed. It is also contended that if the petitioner is released on
bail, there is every likeliho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.