SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Lisa Gill, CJ, Ninala Jayasurya, J
Rasipogula Nagaraju – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Rasul Shaik – Respondent
WRIT APPEAL No: 513 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Chiranjeevi Babu
For the Respondents: GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Dev., GP for Home, GP for Revenue, Mattegunta Sudhir

Installation of a statue on government land or public roads without valid permission, especially in violation of peace-maintenance orders under Section 145 Cr.P.C., is illegal and warrants removal to serve the public interest.

Headnote:The matter concerns the installation of a statue on a public road in a village. The appellants contended that the installation was based on a Gram Sabha resolution and an endorsement from the Tahsildar. However, the court found that the initial resolution allocating land had been cancelled by a subsequent resolution. The statue was installed without valid permission and was found to obstruct an approach road, leading the Single Judge to order its removal under relevant government guidelines. The primary issue was whether the installation of the statue was legal and whether the Single Judge's order for removal was sustainable. The court reasoned that since the land allocation was cancelled and the installation occurred without permission during the operation of an order under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to maintain peace, the act was unauthorized and illegal. The court distinguished prior case law, noting that the current installation caused traffic obstruction and lacked legal sanction. Writ Appeal is disposed of directing that 3rd respondent and other authorities to ensure that statue of Dr.B.R.Ambedkar is shifted from the subject matter area with due respect, care and caution, strictly in terms of relevant Government orders and kept in a safe area, till an alternative site is identified and permission for erection is accorded.

Table of Content
1. background of the unauthorized statue installation and the lower court's order for removal. (Para 1 , 2)
2. conflicting arguments regarding land allocation resolutions and the necessity of permission. (Para 3 , 4)
3. analysis of the cancellation of land allocation and the unauthorized timing of installation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. distinguishing case law based on road obstruction and lack of valid permission. (Para 8 , 9)
5. illegality of installation during the operation of peace-maintenance orders under section 145 cr.p.c. (Para 10 , 11)
6. direction for the respectful shifting of the statue to a safe area until a legal site is identified. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

The Court made the following JUDGMENT:

(Per Hon’ble Mr.Justice Ninala Jayasurya)

Feeling aggrieved by order of learned Single Judge dated 01.12.2025 in W.P.No.11762 of 2023, appellants / third parties filed the present Writ Appeal.

2) 1st respondent filed said Writ Petition seeking to declare inaction of official respondents in not removing statue of Dr.B.R.Ambedkar installed in middle of 12 feet narrow road in Ward No.1 of Jaladurgam Village, Peapully Mandal, Nandyal District as illegal, voilative of the orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal No(s).8519 of 2006 dated 18.01.2013 in I.A.No.10 of 2012 and G.O.Ms.No.18 dated 18.02.2013 and for consequential directions to remove the same. Gram Panchayat filed counter affidavit, wherein it was stated that some villagers without knowledge of Panchayat authorities installed statue overnight in a different place, which is about 10 feet away from marked place and is obstructing approach road. Learned Single Judge after considering pleadings and submissions, arrived at a conclusion that statue was erected 10 feet away from the earmarked place, thereby obstructing approach road. Holding that statue has been erected without obtaining proper permission, learned Single Judge disposed of Writ Petition with a direction to District Collector to follow guidelines prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.55, dated 08.04.2021 for removal of statue as expeditiously as possible.

3) Learned counsel for appellants made submissions inter alia, to the effect that order under Challenge is not sustainable, in as much as the same was passed by taking into consideration facts, which were not completely disclosed in Writ Petition. It is his contention that pursuant to resolution dated 22.12.2022 passed by Gram Sabha, Jaladurgam allotting an extent of Ac.0-01 cents in Sy.No.854 for installation of statue of Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, 5th respondent, after enquiry, issued an Endorsement dated 24.12.2022 stating that land of an extent of Ac.0-01 cents in Survey No.854 as per resolution of Gram Panchayat has been allocated. Accordingly, Statue was installed in the land allocated in Sy.No.854, however same is sought to be removed on the premise that it was erected in the middle of road. He strenuously contends that photographs filed along with material papers clearly discloses that statue is away from C.C. road and rastha, does not cause obstruction to traffic or public utility. He also submits that in the light of the decision of learned Judge in Nelakudithi Venkatapathi Rao and Another Vs State of A.P., and Others , 2016 LawSuit (Hyd) 31, no permission is required for installation of statue as the place on which statue was erected does not form part of either road or road margin or any sideway. In any event, he submits that Order under challenge was obtained by suppression of correct facts and behind back of appellants herein. Therefore, the same is liable to be set aside.

4) Per contra, learned standing counsel for Gram Panchayat as well as learned Government Pleader representing revenue authorities made submissions to sustain order under appeal. Learned standing counsel submits that Gram Sabha, in view of objections raised by villagers and elders, vide resolution dated 02.01.2023 cancelled its earlier resolution alloc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top