SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21185

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Y. Lakshmana Rao, J
Nuthalapati Sony Wood – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 12682/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Venkata Durga Rao Anantha
For the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

Police authorities cannot interfere in purely civil disputes or dispossess parties from property without following the due process of law or obtaining an order from a competent court.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, alleging that the police authorities illegally interfered in a purely civil dispute between the petitioner society and a private respondent. It was contended that the police forcibly trespassed into the premises bearing Door No. 10-36, S Annavaram Village, Tuni Mandal, Kakinada District, locked the building, and unlawfully handed over possession to the private respondent without any order from a competent court, violating Articles 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India. The primary issue was whether the police could interfere in a pending civil dispute and dispossess a party without legal authority. The court observed the submissions of the Assistant Government Pleader and reasoned that police interference in civil matters is impermissible unless the due process of law is followed. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent police not to interfere henceforth in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, without following due process of law.

Table of Content
1. allegations of illegal police interference and dispossession in a pending civil property dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. police are prohibited from interfering in civil disputes without following due process of law. (Para 5 , 6)

The Court made the following:

ORDER

1. The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

“…to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th Respondent and their staff in illegally interfering in a purely civil dispute between the Petitioner Society and the 5th Respondent forcibly trespassing into the subject premises locking the building dispossessing the Petitioner Society from the property bearing Door No.10-36 S Annavaram Village Tuni Mandal Kakinada District and unlawfully handing over possession/continuing to aid the illegal possession of the 5th Respondent without any authority of law and without any order of a competent Court as illegal arbitrary unconstitutional violative of Articles 14 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents more particularly Respondents No 3 and 4 to restore possession of the subject premises to the Petitioner Society by removing the illegal interference of the 5th Respondent and pass….”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader.

3. Mr. A. Venkata Durga Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that respondent No.4 is interfering in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner society and respondent No.5 by forcibly trespassing into the subject premises, locking the building, dispossessing the petitioner society from the property bearing D.No.10-36, situated at S. Annavaram Village, Tuni Mandal, Kakinada District, and unlawfully handing over possession to respondent No.5, thereby continuing to aid the illegal possession of respondent No.5 without any authority of law and without any order passed by a competent Court.

4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, submits that the police have never interfered in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents.

5. Having regard to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, and recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent police not to interfere henceforth in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, without following due process of law.

6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top