2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21201
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Bhimavarapu Venkata Bharath Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 11919/2026
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:20927
APHC010216382026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3331]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 11919/2026
Between:
1. B HIMAVARAPU VENKATA BHARATH REDDY, S/O.NAGI REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. MUNNANGI
VILLAGE, KOLLIPARA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522304
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
-522237
2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. –
522004
3. T HE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MUNNANGI GRAM PANCHAYAT,
KOLLIPARA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522304
4. T HE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOLLIPARA POLICE STATION,
GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522304
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature
of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not
removing the illegal political flexi banners erected on the Petitioner's
residential property as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and violative of Articles 14, 21,
##PAGE2##Page 2 of 4
2026:APHC:20927
and 300A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the
Respondents to forthwith remove the said illegal flexi banners, pipes and
rods, to prevent future unauthorized erection of such banners, to take
appropriate legal action against the persons responsible, and to provide
necessary police protection to the Petitioner and his family, and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the Respondents to immediately remove the illegal flexi banners and
structures from the Petitioner’s residential property and to pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
May be pleased to amend the cause title of Writ Petition by substituting The
Gram Panchayat, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary, Munnangi Gram
Panchayat, Kollipara Mandal, Guntur District. 522304 for the existing 3rd
respondent instead of The Panchayat Secretary, Munnangi Gram Panchayat,
Kollipara Mandal, Guntur District. 522304 in the Writ Petition and affidavit filed
in support thereof in the interest of justice and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GADE NAGESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. GP FOR HOME
3. GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
The above writ petition was filed to declare the inaction on the part of
respondent No.3 in removing flexi banners erected on the petitioner’s
residential property bearing D.No.2-116, Munnangi Village, Kollipara Mandal,
Guntur District, as illegal and arbitrary.
##PAGE3##Page 3 of 4
2026:APHC:20927
2. Heard Sri K. Nageswara Reddy, learned counsel representing
Sri G. Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Panuku Rajesh
Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader, appeared for respondents 1 &
2, Sri Hruthik, learned counsel representing Sri M. Sudhir, learned Standing
Counsel, appeared for respondent No.3 and learned Assistant Government
Pleader for Home appeared for respondent No.4.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the
absolute owner and possessor of the house bearing D.No.2-116, Munnangi
Village, Kollipara Mandal, Guntur District. The petitioner constructed a
residential structure, and the same was assessed for tax. The petitioner has
been paying taxes (Ex.P1). Be that as it may, a flexi was erected on the
compound wall of the residential house, without the petitioner’s consent. The
petitioner made a request to respondent No.3 to remove the flexi. However,
the same has not