SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21251

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B Krishna Mohan, J
VALEKADI NARASAPPA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 1109/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Dhanunjaya Baru
For the Respondents: GP for Revenue

A writ petition challenging the arbitrary marking of land records as disputed may be dismissed if the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the matter.

Headnote:The petitioner approached the court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, challenging the action of the respondent in marking land records, specifically Adangal and 1-B Record of Rights, as digitally unsigned and disputed in red color without issuing notice or passing a formal order. The petitioner contended that such action was arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice. The primary issue was whether the marking of land records as disputed without due process of law was illegal. However, the court did not examine the merits of the case as the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 3RD respondent by marking as digitally unsigned with Red Colour as disputed on the copies of Adangal as well as 1-B, Record of Rights in respect of my landed property admeasuring an extent of Ac.2-00 Cents in Sy.No.207 of Naganathana Halli, Adoni Mandal of Kurnool District, without issuing any notice and without passing any order and without having any authority of law, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and also contrary to the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and the Rules made there under and Articles 14, 21 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4TH respondent to record copies of Adangal Pahanies and 1-B for my said land as digitally signed by deleting the Red Colour marking and issue digitally signed copies of adangal and 1-B in respect of above property land and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4TH respondents to issue Digitally signed copies of Adangal pahanies and 1-B Namoona in Record of Rights by deleting the Red Colour marking in respect of my landed property admeasuring Ac.2-00 Cents in Sy.No.2Q7 of Naganathana Halli, Adoni Mandal of Kurnool District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass

The Court made the following ORDER:

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top