IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 454/2017
Between:
1. SHAIK SHARUKH, S/O. SYARABHANU, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
OCC: NIL, R/O. 26TH WARD, REPALLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF A P, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at
Hyderabad, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Revision Petition being aggrieved by the judgement passed by the Learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Repalle. Guntur District, A.P in S C No. 19 of 2014 dated 16.9.2014 which was confirmed by the Learned XI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tenali, Guntur District, A.P. in Criminal Appeal No. 339 of 2014 on 14.2.2017 to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 7 (Seven) years and fine of Rs.5,000-00 in default in payment of fine amount, the accused shall suffer simple imprisonment for a period of One Year for the charged offence under section 376 of I.P.C. Further, the accused was also sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of three months for the charged offence punishable Under Section 417 of IPC.
IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 681 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified copy of the Judgment passed by the Learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Repalle, Guntur District in SC.No.19 of 2014 on 16.09.2014 and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 720 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the sentence passed by learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Repalle. Guntur District, A.P in S C No. 19 of 2014 dated 16.9.2014 which was confirmed by the Learned XI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tenali, Guntur District, A.P. in Criminal Appeal No. 339 of 2014 on 14.2.2017 and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the said Crl.RC.
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to consider the directions of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 2891 of 2026 dated 08.04.2026 and reopen the Criminal Revision Case No.454 of 2017, for hearing and dispose of the same Avithin two months from the date of the said order and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to Grant interim bail to the petitioner for a period of two weeks or till 20.05.2026, in Crl.RC No. 454 of 2017, dated 21.04.2022 on such terms and conditions as this Honble Court deems fit and proper, in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.JADA SRAVAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 454/2017
ORDER:
The petitioner was convicted by the learned trial Court for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 417 of IPC and the conviction was confirmed by the learned Appellate Court by concurrent findings.
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case is that prosecutrix (P.W.1) was residing in her maternal grand-parents‟ house. Accused was also residing in the neighbouring house with his mother. Accused was studying II Year B.Tech in one Engineering College. Prosecutrix also I Year student of the B.Tech College. There was love affair between each other. On 29.01.2012, accused came to the house where P.W.1 was residing, by jumping over the wall and with the pretext of marriage, participated in sex with prosecutrix by saying some deceitful words. Thereafter, accused left the house. At that time, he was witnessed by L.W.5 and L.W.6. Again, in the month of June, on the pretext of talk at the house of L.W.4, accused again had sexual intercourse with prosecutrix. Later, accused stopped speaking with P.W.1 and d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.