SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21581

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B KRISHNA MOHAN
NAGOTHU MARY VAIBHAVA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 17677/2025



APHC010351302025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3233]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 17677/2025 Between:

1. N AGOTHU MARY VAIBHAVA, W/O. NARISETTI DEVA RAJU AGED 26 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 10/143, THURAKAPALEM VILLAGE, NAKARIKAL MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH

2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT., NARASARAOPET.

3. T HE REVENUE DISIVISONAL OFFICER, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT.

4. T HE TAHSILDAR, NADENDIA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT

5. P UDOTA PHELOMENA, W/O. JOJAIAH, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. KANUPARRU VILLAGE, NADENDIA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT

6. P UDOTA KATTHERENAMMA, W/O. LURTHAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC-HOUSEWIFE, R/O. KANUPARRU VILLAGE, NADENDIA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT

7. P UDOTA CHAMANTHI, W/O. SHOWRAIAHA, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. KANUPARRU VILLAGE, NADENDIA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRIC

8. P UDOTA MARI KISHORE BABU, , S/O. JOJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. KANUPARRU VILLAGE, NADENDIA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, One in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Wirt under Article 226 of Constitution of India, Direction or Order declaring the action of the 4rt respondent in mutating the Respondents No. 5 to 7 names in web records for an extent of Ac.0.49 cents each in Survey No.22-BC in Khata No. 3126, 495, and 504 respectively Situated at Kanuparru Village, Nadendia Mandal, Palnadu District and subsequently mutating respondents No. 8 name for total an extent of Ac. 1.48 cents in Survey No.22-BC in Khata No. 1789 in L.P. No. 3022, 3023, and 3024 Situated at Kanuparru Village Village, Nadendia Mandal, Palnadu District without issuing notice to the petitioner and without following the procedure is illegal, arbitrary and volatile of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and also violative of the provisions of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act 1971 and consequently direct the respondent No. 4 to delete the 8th Respondent name in the web records by mutate the petitioner for an Extent of Ac. 1.48 cents in Survey No.22-BC in L.P. No. 3022, 3023, and 3024 (Ac. 0.49 cents each LP number) Situated at Kanuparru Village, Nadendia Mandal, Palnadu District in Revenue records by considering Registered Sale Deed Doc No. 8188 of 2025 dated 09.05.2025 SRO Narasaraopet and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 4 to mutate the Petitioner name by deleting the 8th Respondent name in the web records for an Extent of Ac. 1.48 cents in Survey No.22-BC in L.P. No. 3022, 3023, and 3024 (Ac. 0.49 cents each LP number) Situated at Kanuparru Village, Nadendia Mandal, Palnadu District in Revenue records by considering Registered Sale Deed Doc No. 8188 of 2025 dated 09.05.2025 SRO Narasaraopet and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PATANJALI PAMIDIGHANTAM

2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and the learned counsel appearing for the unofficial respondents.

2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent in mutating the respondent Nos.5 to 7 names in web records for an extent of Ac.0.49 cents each in Sy.No.22-BC in Khata No.3126, 495 and 504 respectively situated at Kanuparru Villa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top