APHC010020662020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 32 OF 2020 Between:

1. M BAHAVANI, W/O LATE M. SURYA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O BRAHMANA VEEDHI AGRAHARAM, CHEEPURUPALLI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

...APPELLANT AND

1. UNION OF INDIA, GENERAL MANAGER,EAST COAST RAILWAY, BHUBANESWAR. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:

1. GEETHA MADHURI N S Counsel for the Respondent:

1. VENNA HEMANTH KUMAR(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL)

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 32 OF 2020 JUDGMENT:

Aggrieved by the dismissal order passed by The Railway Claims Tribunal, Amaravati Bench, at Guntur (in short ‘the learned Tribunal’) in O.A II (U) No.163 of 2013, dated 05.09.2019 the Applicant has preferred the present Appeal.

2. The brief facts of the claim application of the Applicant before the Tribunal is that one Mr. M. Nagaraju (hereinafter referred to as ‘the deceased’) with a view to go to E-Road junction to work as a contract coolie and went to