SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 22013

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Subba Reddy Satti, J
Kondapavuluri Benod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Kondapavuluri Keerthi Swaroopa Rani – Respondent
I.A.No.3 of 2026 IN/And CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1566/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Anil Kumar Dasari
For the Respondents: Devalaraju Anil Kumar

Granting interim relief regarding schedule properties in an unnumbered suit while exercising supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution is legally impermissible as the merits of the suit are yet to be determined by the trial court.

Headnote:The petitioners challenged the inaction of the Trial Court in numbering a suit for partition filed on 12.02.2026, despite compliance with office objections. The Trial Court had posted the matter for orders on 15.06.2026. This Court, invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India, considered the validity of granting interim relief regarding property alienation in an unnumbered suit. The primary issue was whether the High Court should exercise its supervisory jurisdiction to grant interim injunctions in unnumbered suits pending before the trial court. The court reasoned that granting interim relief in an unnumbered suit before the trial court has exercised its judicial mind and registered the suit is impermissible, as it pre-empts the procedural requirements of the trial court. The Court disposed of the Civil Revision Petition, directing the Trial Court to pass appropriate orders regarding the numbering of the suit by 15.06.2026 or within one week thereafter, and vacated all interim orders.

Table of Content
1. the background regarding the delay in suit registration and the request for interim protection. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. the court's decision that supervisory jurisdiction cannot be used to grant interim relief in unnumbered suits. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)

Special Original Jurisdiction

The Court made the following order:

The present Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the inaction of the Trial Court in numbering the suit filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs on 12.02.2026, for partition.

2. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs and the respondents herein are the defendants in the unnumbered suit.

3. The petitioners filed a suit for partition on 12.02.2026, which was assigned G.L.No.869 of 2026. It is the case of the petitioners/plaintiffs that the plaint was returned by the office of the Metropolitan District & Sessions Judge with certain objections, which were duly complied with and, thereafter, the plaint was re-presented. According to the petitioners, after hearing the learned counsel, the learned Trial Court posted the matter to 15.06.2026 for orders.

4. Heard Sri D. Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners/plaintiffs and Sri Devalaraju Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents/defendants.

5. Sri D. Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners/plaintiffs, submits that despite presentation of the suit on 12.02.2026 by complying with all office objections, the suit has not been numbered till date. He would further contend that taking advantage, the respondents are attempting to alienate the schedule properties, thereby causing serious prejudice to the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing for respondents would submit that as seen from the copy of ‘A’ dairy filed along with the CRP, the learned trial court posted the unnumbered suit to 15.06.2026 for orders.

6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that a Coordinate Bench, while entertaining the present revision petition, granted an interim order restraining the respondents from alienating the properties covered under Schedule ‘A’, Schedule 'B' and Schedule 'C' appended to the unnumbered suit (O.S. No. ___ of 2026), presented on 12.02.2026, till the next date of hearing.

7. As seen from the record, the Trial Court, having heard learned counsel for the petitioners/plaintiffs, adjourned the unnumbered suit to 15.06.2026 for orders. The suit itself is yet to be numbered, and in fact, the learned trial court heard the advocate and posted the unnumbered suit to 15.06.2026.

8. In the considered opinion of this Court, granting an interim relief in respect of the subject properties in an unnumbered suit while exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is impermissible.

9. Given the facts and circumstances, the above Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, directing the Trial Court to pass appropriate orders regarding the numbering of the suit strictly in accordance with law by 15.06.2026 or within one week thereafter.

10. The interim order granted earlier in I.A.No.2 of 2026 stands vacated. Accordingly, I.A.No.3 of 2026 is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, any pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top