HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
BOLLINA VENKATA RAO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent
WP 1950/2024
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:22599
APHC010030912024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3331]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1950/2024
Between:
1. B OLLINA VENKATA RAO, S/O RAGHAVAYYA, AGED ABOUT 59
YEARS R/O D-NO. L-14B ,GINEJARLA (V) CHINTALAPUDI MANDAL
WEST GODAVARI DIST.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF PANCHAYATI RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATI.
2. T HE COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, TADEPALLI, AMARAVATHI.
3. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DIST,
BHIMAVARAM.
4. T HE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, JANGAREDDY
GUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DIST.
5. T HE MANDAL PARISHADTH DEVOLEPMENT OFFICER/ MGNRGS
PROGRAMM OFFICER, CHINTHALPUDI (M), WEST GODAVARI
DIST.
6. T HE GANIJARLA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS
SECRETARY,CHINTHALAPUDI (M), WEST GODAVARI DIST.
##PAGE2##Page 2 of 5
2026:APHC:22599
7. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND PLANNING
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of
Writ of Mandamus to declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents
herein not releasing and paying the bill amounts worth of Rs.8,77,295/- with
interest 6PERCENT per annum under the grant of MGNRGS for Execution
and Construction of Grama panchayath building as illegal arbitrary and
violative of Article 14, 16 AND 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently
to direct the respondents to release and pay the bill amounts worth of Rs.
8,77,295/- with intrest 6 PERCENT per annum under the grant of MGNRGS
to the petitioner forthwith and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to to direct the respondents to release and pay the bill amounts worth
of Rs. 8,77,295/- with intrest 6% per annum under the grant of MGNRGS to
the petitioner forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SAMEERA BOKKA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT)
2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP)
3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP)
The Court made the following:
##PAGE3##Page 3 of 5
::ORDER ::
Heard Sri Sri Bokka Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner
and Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for
Panchayat Raj and Rural Development and Finance for respondents 1 to 5
and 7 and learned standing counsel for respondent No.6.
2. The above writ petition was filed to declare the action of the
respondents in not releasing an amount of Rs.8,77,295/- payable to the
petitioner for the work executed i.e. „Construction of Gram Panchayat Office
Building at Ganijerla (V) of Chintalapudi (M)‟, as illegal and arbitrary.
3. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned Assistant Government
Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development submitted the instructions
of the Executive Engineer, PR Division, Jangareddygudem.
4. A perusal of the instructions would disclose that the petitioner has
executed the aforementioned work and the amount payable is Rs.10,40,111/-
+ Rs.2,64,179/- (G.P Portion) totaling to Rs.13,04,290/-, out of which
Rs.3,82,142/- was paid and the balance amount payable to the petitioner is
Rs.9,22,148/-. The written instructions are made part of the record.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner endorses the same.
6. Thus, as seen from the instructions there is no dispute regarding the
execution of works and the petitioner‟s entitlement for Rs.9,22,148/-. Since the
amount payable is admitted and undisputed, t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.