SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 24409

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Balaji Medamalli, J
Gunji Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 3349/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Gollamudi Arun Kumar
For the Respondents: Amrutha Boppudi, Sumanth Amirapu, S S Bhatt, GP for Cooperation

The matter was disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioner without the court adjudicating on the merits of the seniority dispute.

Headnote:The petitioner approached the court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a provisional seniority list issued via circular dated 16-08-2023 by the 5th respondent, alleging it to be illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, as well as contrary to previous court orders and society bye-laws. The primary issue was whether the issuance of the provisional seniority list was a colourable exercise of power. However, before the court could delve into the merits of the case or the ratio decidendi, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Table of Content
1. disposal of writ petition upon petitioner's request for withdrawal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order, or direction, more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th Respondent in issuing provisional seniority list through a circular dated 16-08-2023 vide Roc. No. EB1/65/TTD ECCS/2023 without having right is illegal, arbitrary, colourable exercise of power, violation of Art 14, 16 of the Constitution of India and Contrary to the common orders passed in W.P. No. 10322 and 3919 of 2008 dated 01-07-2010 and against bye-laws of the society and consequently set aside or quash the circular issued by the 5th respondent vide Roc. No. EB1/65/TTD ECCS/2023 dated 16-08-2023 and to pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondents No. 1 to 5 not to fill up the vacancy of the Senior Assistant Post in the 4th respondent office without considering the of seniority of the petitioner and to pass

IA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 08.02.2024 passed in W.P.No. 3349 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GOLLAMUDI ARUN KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. AMRUTHA BOPPUDI
2. SUMANTH AMIRAPU
3. S S BHATT
4. GP FOR COOPERATION

The Court made the following:

ORDER

1. Ms. Indhumathi, learned counsel representing Mr. Gollamudi Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner intends to withdraw the matter.

2. Taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top