2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 26051
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
Konisi Trinadharao – Appellant
Versus
Subuddhi Ramarao – Respondent
CRP 1976/2026
##PAGE1## ##PAGE2##
2
2026V:SA,JP HC:29269
CRP.No.1976 of 2026
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the
circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be
pleased toAggrieved by the impugned Decree and Order dtd. 19-06-2026
passed in LA. 450/2025 in O.S. No.99/2018, on the file of Junior Civil Judge,
Cheepurapalli, Vizianagaram District,
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Pleased to Stay all further proceedings in the suit O.S. 99 / 2018, the file of
Junior Civil Judge Court, Cheepurupalli, Vizianagaram district and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. M V RAJA RAAM
2. Dr M V Raja Raam
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T V SRI DEVI
The Court made the following:
##PAGE3##3
2026V:SA,JP HC:29269
CRP.No.1976 of 2026
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India by the petitioners/defendants aggrieved by the order passed by the
learned Special Judicial Magistrate of I Class (Mobile) – cum – II Additional
Junior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, dated 19.06.2026 in I.A.No.450 of 2025 in
O.S.No.99 of 2018, whereby, the Court below dismissed the application filed
by the petitioners/defendants under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil
Procedure (for short ‗CPC‘), for appointing an advocate commissioner to
localize the properties situated in S.No.112-6 at Kotha Gavidi street,
Cheepurupalli village with the assistance of Mandal Surveyor, Cheepurupalli
as well as to note the physical features on the ground.
2. Brief facts of the case are as under:
(a) For convenience, the parties will be referred to as they were
arrayed in the suit. The plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 are brothers and the 3rd plaintiff is
the son of the 1st plaintiff. The plaint schedule property, admeasuring Acs.0.76
cents in S.No.112/6 of Cheepurupalli village, is said to have succeeded upon
the plaintiffs from their ancestors and accordingly, revenue authorities have
issued pattadar passbooks and title deeds in their favour.
(b) While the matter stood thus, the defendants, who are a couple,
approached the plaintiffs for purchasing the plaint schedule properties,
however, as the plaintiffs refused to sell the same, the defendants are alleged
##PAGE4##4
2026V:SA,JP HC:29269
CRP.No.1976 of 2026
to have bore grudge against the plaintiffs and started interfering with the
peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property without
having any right or title over the same. Hence, the plaintiffs filed O.S.No.99 of
2018 against the defendants seeking the following prayer:
―i) For permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents
and servants from in any way interfering with the peaceful possession and
enjoyment of the plaint schedule property in any way and also from
trespassing into the plaint schedule property;
ii) For costs of the suit; and
iii) Such other relief or relieves as the Honourable court deems fit and
proper in the circumstances of the case‖
(c) The defendants have contested the suit by filing their written
statement. It is the case of the defendants that the land admeasuring Acs.0.05
cents in S.No.154-10 which is correlated to S.No.112-6 of Kotha Gavidi street
is purchased by father of the 1st defendant under registered sale deed dated
02.01.1975 and the same is also reflected in the Will dated 09.10.2017
executed by his late father. After recording evidence adduced by both the
parties, when the Court below adjourned the matter on several occasions for
arguments, the defendants filed an application under Order XXVI Rule 9 of
CPC, with a plea to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to localize the plaint
schedule property and his property situated in S.No.112-6 with the help of
surveyor, which was dismissed by the Court below vide impugned order dated
19.06.2026. Aggrieved by the same, the defendants filed this revision petition.
##PAGE5##5
2026V:SA,JP HC:29269
CRP.No.1976 of 2026