2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 27922
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Balaji Medamalli, J
POTHARLANKA RAGHUNATHA BABU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 6550/2023
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Chukka Harika
For the Respondents: GP For Services III
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not fixing the seniority of the petitioner w.e.f. 03.10.2010 on par with candidates who were got appointed earlier to the petitioner in DSC-2008 with all consequential benefits like fixation of pay and monetary benefits from the date of his joining into service as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper, discriminatory, principles of natural justice guaranteed under Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to fix the seniority of the petitioner w.e.f. 03.10.2010 on par with candidates, who got appointed earlier to the petitioner in DSC-2008 with all consequential benefits like fixation of pay and monetary benefits from the date of his joining into service and pass such
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the seniority of the petitioner w.e.f. 03.10.2010 on par with candidates who were got appointed earlier to the petitioner in DSC-2008 in accordance with the Memo No.754017/ Services-I/A.1/2017, dated 27.06.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such
The Court made the following:
ORDER
Ms. Chukka Harika, learned counsel for the petitioner made a request to permit withdrawal of the Writ Petition. Permission is granted.
Taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.