SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 27922

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Balaji Medamalli, J
POTHARLANKA RAGHUNATHA BABU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 6550/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Chukka Harika
For the Respondents: GP For Services III

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not fixing the seniority of the petitioner w.e.f. 03.10.2010 on par with candidates who were got appointed earlier to the petitioner in DSC-2008 with all consequential benefits like fixation of pay and monetary benefits from the date of his joining into service as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper, discriminatory, principles of natural justice guaranteed under Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to fix the seniority of the petitioner w.e.f. 03.10.2010 on par with candidates, who got appointed earlier to the petitioner in DSC-2008 with all consequential benefits like fixation of pay and monetary benefits from the date of his joining into service and pass such

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the seniority of the petitioner w.e.f. 03.10.2010 on par with candidates who were got appointed earlier to the petitioner in DSC-2008 in accordance with the Memo No.754017/ Services-I/A.1/2017, dated 27.06.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such

The Court made the following:

ORDER

Ms. Chukka Harika, learned counsel for the petitioner made a request to permit withdrawal of the Writ Petition. Permission is granted.

Taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top