SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 30837

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA AT P A R M A A D R E A S V H A TI [3543]


(Special Original Jurisdiction)


WRIT PETITION NO: 3499/2025

WRIT PETITION NO: 17909/2025


Between:

M/s.sri Vani Educational Society, ...PETITIONER

AND

The Assistant Commissioner and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)


Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. RAMINENI SUDHEER

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. T NIRANJAN Deputy Solicitor General of India

2. Y N VIVEKANANDA


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR


TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026


___________________________

JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA


______________________

JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR


28.07.2026


DSB


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR


WP No.3499 & 17909 of 2025


Date 28.07.2026


U

DSB

The Court made the following common order:

( Per Hon ’ble Sri Justice T.C.D. Sekhar)

1. As the issue involved in these writ petitions is similar, they are being disposed of by way this common order.

2. Writ petition No.3499 of 2025 is filed questioning orders dated 07.01.2025, in relation to the assessment years 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22, issued by the 4th respondent, whereunder the application filed by the petitioner under Section 119 (2)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Writ petition No.17909 of 2025 is filed questioning the demand notice dated 16.06.2025, issued by the 1st respondent, pursuant to the assessment orders passed against the petitioner.

3. The petitioner is a registered educational society having registered under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, by virtue of proceedings dated 03.11.2009, issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Vijayawada. As per the trust deed/memorandum or articles of association dated 03.11.2008, the petitioner has filed an application in Form-10A for registration under Section 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act on 10.08.2009. In furtherance thereto, the registration of the petitioner was done from the assessment year2010-11.

4. Be that as it may, for the assessment year 2019-20, the petitioner filed its return on 13.11.2019, claiming exemption on Rs.3,53,27,987/- under Sections 11 & 12 of the Income Tax Act, as the petitioner being a charitable institution and shown the gross income as Rs.0. Similarly, it had claimed exemption for the assessment years 2020-21 and 2021-22. While so, the 2nd respondent issued notice of intimation dated 09.06.2020, under Section 143 (1) of the Act, rejecting the claim of the petitioner for exemption on the ground that the details of registration under Section 12AA or approval under Section 10(23C)(iv) had not been furnished by the petitioner and filing of Form-10B is mandatory. Subsequently, assessment order came to be passed on 26.12.2003, in relation to the above periods raising a total demand of Rs.4,79,92,300/-. Thereafter, the petitioner said to have approached the 1st respondent and informed that the petitioner society is exempt from payment of tax as the petitioner was registered under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The 1st respondent in turn informed the petitioner that, as Form-10B was not filed, the assessment order came to be passed and directed the petitioner to approach the 4th respondent. Accordingly, the petitioner filed three applications under Section 119(2)(b) of the Act to condone the delay in filing Form-10B for the assessment years 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22. The applications filed by the petitioner came to be rejected by separate orders dated 07.01.2025, which are being impugned in WP No.3499 of 2025. In the process of recovery, the 1st respondent issued notice dated 16.06.2025, the same is being impugned in WP No.17909 of 2025.

5. The counsel for petitioner would submit that the last date for filing Form-10B was 31.10.2019, whereas the petitioner filed the same on 13.11.2019, with a delay of 13 days. Similarly, the petitioner filed Form-10B on 14.02.2021 and 08.02.2021 for the periods 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively i.e., within the extended date of filing. The applications for the petitioner came to be rejected by impugned orders dated 07.01.2025, on the ground that the same were not filed within the due date and the petitioner has not shown any cause in preventing it from filing Form-10B. It is the specific case of the petitioner that, in relation to period 2019-20, the charted accountant of the petitioner Sri G.R.Sathyanarayana, suffered with heart ailment and took treatment in Care Hospital, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, during the month of October, 2019. On account of the same, there was a delay of 13 days in filing the return for the year 2019-20. He would further submit that, insofar as assessment years 2020-21 and 2021-22, he could not file return in time in view of the Covid pandemic p

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top