SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 37554

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K SREENIVASA REDDY
CHINTHALAPATI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA RAJU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 8676/2025



##PAGE1##

Date of reserved for orders : 21.07.2026 Date of pronouncement : 08.10.2026 Date of uploading : 08.10.2026 APHC010168512025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3327]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 8676/2025 Between:

1. CHINTHALAPATI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O RAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.4-78/3, PEDDA VEEDHI, GANAPAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

2. CHINTHALAPATI SUBBA RAJU,, S/O RAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.4-78/3, PEDDA VEEDHI, GANAPAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

3. CHINTALAPATI PADMAVATHI,, W/O LATE SURYA NARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O D.NO.4-78/3, PEDDA VEEDHI, GANAPAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, GANAPAVARAM MANDAL, GANAPAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

5. THE JAGANNADHAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP., BY ITS SECRETARY, JAGANNADHAPURAM, GANAPAVARAM MANDAL. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

6. RAJ VEGESNA FOUNDATION, DOOR NO. 10-27-2-4, KAILASMETTA, SEKHAR LAYOUT, WALTAIR UP LANDS, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...RESPONDENT(S):

##PAGE2##

20 26:APHC:43025 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in allowing the 6th respondent to demolish the joint road situated in R.S. No. 187/2 of Jagannadhapuram village, Ganapavaram mandal, West Godavari District, which is only the ingress and egress for the petitioners' and others' property situated in Sy. No. 179, 180 and 181 of Jagannadhapuram village as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and against the Norms of Public Policy and Principles of Natural Justice and to issue a consequential direction directing the Respondent Authorities to protect the road being used by the petitioners and other villagers and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent authorities to restrain the 6th respondent in demolishing the joint road situated in R.S. No. 187/2 of Jagannadhapuram village, Ganapavaram mandal, West Godavari District forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioners to construct a fresh pathway in Sy.No. 187/2 of Jagannadhapuram Village, Ganapavaram Mandal, West Godavari District forthwith in order to reach their fields pending the disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 02.04.2025 in WP.No.8676 of 2025 and to dismiss the writ petition as there are no sustainable grounds in filing this writ petition before the Hon’ble Court and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased prayed that this Hon’ble Court to vacate interim orders dt. 02.04.2025in W.P.No. 8676 of 2025 and to dismiss the Writ Petition as there are no sustainable grounds in filing this Writ Petition before the Hon’ble Court and pass such

##PAGE3##

2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top