IN THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY (Appellate Jurisdiction)
APPEAL NO.431 OF 2022 Dated : 23.12.2025 Present: Hon’ble Ms. Seema Gupta, Technical Member (Electricity)
Hon’ble Mr. Virender Bhat, Judicial Member In the matter of:
M/s Korba Power Limited Through its Authorised Representative Mr. Tanmay Vyas (Associate General Manger)
Having its office at, Flat No.5A, 5th Floor, D. No.6-3-626/1/601, Parameshwara Apartment, Anand Nagar, Khairatabad, Hyderabad-500 004 Telangana Also at Corporate office:
K P Epitome, 4th Floor, Energy Regulatory and Commercial Group (ERCG)
Anani Power Ltd Near DAV International School Makarba, Ahmedabad- 380 051, Gujarat Email: anil.sh@lancogroup.com … Appellant Versus
11. Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission Through its Secretary, Bays No. 33-36, Sector-4, Panchkula – 134112, Haryana Email: secretary.herc@nic.in
22. PTC India Limited Through its Chairman & Managing Director
2nd Floor, NBCC Tower, 15, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi – 110066 Email: bharat.sharma@ptcindia.com
33. Haryana Power Purchase Center (On behalf of M/s Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd.)
Through its Chief Engineer 2nd Floor, Shakti Bhawan, Sector-6, Panchkula – 134109 Email: cehppc@uhbvn.org.in … Respondent(s)
Counsel on record for the Appellant(s) : Deepak Khurana Vineet Tayal Abhishek Bansal Nishtha Wadhwa Bhaskar Counsel on record for the Respondent(s) : Poorva Saigal Shubham Arya Ravi Nair Shikha Sood Reeha Singh Anumeha Smiti for Res. 3
JUDGMENT
PER HON’BLE MR. VIRENDER BHAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER
1. The instant appeal relates to the claim of the appellant M/s Korba Power Limited for interest for the years 2016 to 2022 on the amounts to which it was found entitled from respondent no.3 by the 1st respondent Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission as well as by this Tribunal vide various orders passed in different proceedings between the parties. In effect, assail is to the order dated 12.05.2022 passed by the Commission in petition nos.5/2014 and 3/2016 and review application no.3/2022 wherein the Commission has held that once the principal amount is paid, the interest outstanding thereon does not attract any further interest even though the same is paid after the substantial period of time, thereby overturning its own conclusion reached in previous order dated 03.03.2022 in the same proceedings between the parties wherein the Commission had held that upon payment of principal amount, the interest outstanding and not paid partakes the character of principal and attracts interest. The appellant is also aggrieved by the rate of interest allowed by the Commission.
2. The appellant runs a 300MW coal based thermal power plant in the State of Chhattisgarh and had entered into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) dated 19.10.2005 with 2nd respondent PTC India Limited for sale of 273MW power (net power output) from Unit-2 of said power plant. The 2nd respondent PTC separately entered into a Power Supply Agreement (PSA) dated 21.09.2006 with Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited for sale of power purchased by it from appellant under the above noted PPA.
3. It appears that on account of failure on the part of respondent no.2 to fulfill its conditions precedent under the PPA, the appellant terminated the PPA on 11.01.2011.
4. We find it apposite to take note of the following proceedings between the parties and the orders passed therein by the Commission as well as by this Tribunal.
5. On 23.01.2015, the Commission passed an order in petition no.05/2014 thereby determining the tariff for the power supplied by appellant during the period commencing from 07.05.2011 till 21.03.2012 as Rs.2.8875/kWh for Financial Year (FY) 2011-2012 and Rs.2.9218/kWh for FY 2012-13. The appellant had been paid a flat tariff of Rs.2.32/kWh for the said period.
6. The said order of the Commission was assailed by both appellant as well as 3rd respondent Haryana Power Purchase Center (HPPC) by filing appeal nos.117/2015 and 107/2015 respectively before this Tribunal.
7. Meanwhile, in pursuance to the order dated 23.01.2015 of the Commission, the appellant filed petition no.3/2016 before the Commission seeking recovery of the differential tariff along with interest. The said petition was disposed off by the Commission vide order dated 12.07.2016 awarding differential tariff to the appellant. However, the Commission did not pass any order qua the interest sought by the appellant on the said principal amount of differential tariff.
8. Petition filed by appellant for review of order dated 12.07.2016 was dismissed by the Commission vide order dated 27.03.2017.
9. Accordingly, the appellant preferred an appeal bearing no.308/2017 in this Tribunal against the order dated 12.07.2016 of the Commission in so far as interest on the differential amount of tariff was not granted to the appellant.
10. The appeal nos.117/2015 and 107/2015 came to be disposed off by this Tribunal vide common judgment dated 21.03.2018 thereby upholding the tariff order dated 23.01.2015 passed by the Commission except on the issue of Operation & Maintenance (O&M) expenses which had not been granted by the Commission but were allowed in the said judgment. Hence, the matter was remanded back to the Commission for fresh consideration on this aspect.
11. Application filed by the appellant in pursuance to said judgment dated 21.03.2018 of this Tribunal was disposed off by the Commission vide order dated 31.10.2018 thereby allowing the claim for O&M
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.