Back
IN THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY (Appellate Jurisdiction)
APPEAL No.282 OF 2016 APPEAL No.313 OF 2016 APPEAL No.314 OF 2016 APPEAL No.165 OF 2017 APPEAL No.166 OF 2017 Dated: 28.08.2025 Present: Hon`ble Mr. Sandesh Kumar Sharma, Technical Member Hon`ble Mr. Virender Bhat, Judicial Member In the matter of:
APPEAL No. 282 of 2016 M/s Lord Chloro Alkali Limited SP-460, Matsya Industrial Area, Alwar – 301030 (Rajasthan) … Appellant Versus
11. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission Through its Secretary Vidyut Viniyamak Bhawan, Sahkar Marg, Near State Motor Garage, Jaipur – 302 005
22. Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited Through its Managing Director Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur – 302005
33. Ajmer Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited Through its Managing Director Hathi Bhata, City Power House, Jaipur Road, Ajmer - 305001
44. Jodhpur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited Through its Managing Director New Power House, Industrial Area, Jodhpur – 342003 … Respondent (s)
Counsel for the Appellant(s) : Anand K. Ganesan Swapna Seshadri Counsel for the Respondent(s) : Raj Kumar Mehta for Res. 1 M. G. Ramachandran, Sr. Adv Ranjitha Ramachandran Poorva Saigal Anushree Bardhan Shubham Arya for Res. 2 to 4 APPEAL No. 313 of 2016 Rajasthan Textile Mills Association B-1, Nawalkha Apartment, Bharat Mata Path, Jamnalal Bajaj Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur-302001 … Appellant Versus
1. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission Through its Secretary Vidyut Viniyamak Bhawan, Sahkar Marg, Near State Motor Garage, Jaipur – 302005
2. Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited Through its Managing Director Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur – 302005
3. Ajmer Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited Through its Managing Director Hathi Bhata, City Power House, Jaipur Road, Ajmer - 305001
4. Jodhpur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited Through its Managing Director New Power House, Industrial Area, Jodhpur – 342003 … Respondent (s)
Counsel for the Appellant(s) : Anand K. Ganesan Swapna Seshadri Counsel for the Respondent(s) : Raj Kumar Mehta for Res. 1 M. G. Ramachandran, Sr. Adv.
Ranjitha Ramachandran Poorva Saigal Anushree Bardhan Shubham Arya for Res. 2 to 4 APPEAL No. 314 of 2016 Rajasthan Steel Chambers C/o Savitri Concast Ltd, F-876, Road No. 14, V.K.I. Area, Jaipur - 302013 … Appellant Versus
1. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission Through its Secretary Vidyut Viniyamak Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Near State Motor Garage, Jaipur – 302005
2. Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited Through its Managing Director Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur – 302016
3. Ajmer Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited Through its Managing Director Hathi Bhata, City Power House, Jaipur Road, Ajmer - 305001
4. Jodhpur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited Through its Managing Director New Power House, Industrial Area, Jodhpur – 342003 … Respondent (s)
Counsel for the Appellant(s) : Anand K. Ganesan Swapna Seshadri Counsel for the Respondent(s) : Raj Kumar Mehta for Res. 1 M.G. Ramachandran, Sr. Adv.
Ranjitha Ramachandran Poorva Saigal Anushree Bardhan Shubham Arya for Res. 2 to 4 APPEAL No. 165 of 2017 Ambuja Cement Ltd., Village - Rabriyawas, Tehsil-Jaitaran, District - Pali (Raj.) Pin - 306709 … Appellant Versus
1. Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (JVVNL)
Through its Managing Director Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur – 302005 Email: cmd@jvvnl.com
2. Jodhpur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (JDVVNL)
Through its Managing Director New Power House, Industrial Area, Jodhpur – 342003 (Raj.)
Email: cmd_jdvvnl@yahoo.com
3. Ajmer Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (AVVNL)
Through its Managing Director Vidyut Bhawan, Panchshel Nagar Makarwali Road, Ajmer – 305004 (Raj.)
Email: ajmerdiscom@yahoo.co.in
4. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission Through its Secretary “Vidyut Vinyamak Bhawan”, Near State Motor Garage, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur – 302005 Email: rercjpr@yahoo.co.in … Respondent (s)
Counsel for the Appellant(s) : P. N. Bhandari Counsel for the Respondent(s) : M.G. Ramachandran, Sr. Adv.
Poorva Saigal Shubham Arya Pallavi Saigal Reeha Singh Tanya Singh Shirin Gupta for Res. 1 to 3 APPEAL No. 166 of 2017 JK Cement Works Kailash Nagar, Nimbahera Distt. Chittorgarh (Raj.) - 312617 … Appellant Versus
1. Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (JVVNL)
Through its Managing Director Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur – 302005 Email: cmd@jvvnl.com
2. Jodhpur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (JDVVNL)
Through its Managing Director New Power House, Industrial Area, Jodhpur – 342003 (Raj.)
Email: cmd_jdvvnl@yahoo.com
3. Ajmer Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (AVVNL)
Through its Managing Director Vidyut Bhawan, Panchshel Nagar Makarwali Road, Ajmer – 305004 (Raj.)
Email: ajmerdiscom@yahoo.co.in
4. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission Through its Secretary “Vidyut Vinyamak Bhawan”, Near State Motor Garage, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur – 302005 Email: rercjpr@yahoo.co.in … Respondent (s)
Counsel for the Appellant(s) : P. N. Bhandari Counsel for the Respondent(s) : M.G. Ramachandran, Sr. Adv.
Poorva Saigal Shubham Arya Pallavi Saigal Reeha Singh Tanya Singh Shirin Gupta for Res. 1 to 3
JUDGMENT
PER HON’BLE MR. VIRENDER BHAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER
1. The open access consumers in the State of Rajasthan have filed this batch of five appeals impugning therein the order dated 24.08.2016 passed by Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) in petition no.548/2015 filed by the three discoms operating in the State of Rajasthan namely Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (in short “JVVNL”), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (in short “AVVNL”), and Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (in short “JoVVNL”), whereby the Commission has determined the additional surcharge under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003 to be applicable on open access consumers in the State as Rs.0.80/kWh effective from 01.05.2016.
Description of the parties: -
2. Appellants in appeal no.282/2016 (namely M/s Lord Chloro Alkali Limited) has a manufacturing facility in Alwar in the State of Rajasthan and is retail supply consumer of JVVNL with a contract demand of 30,000kVa. It has also been granted open access permission within the contract demand and has been procuring electricity through open access from Indian Energy Exchange (IEX) since March, 2015.
3. Appellant in appeal no.313/2016 M/s Rajasthan Textile Mills Association is an association of textile mills in the State of Rajasthan which was formed by the different industrial units for their welfare and better functioning. The association had, on behalf of its members, filed objections before the Commission objecting to the levy of additional surcharge by the distribution licensees and participated in the hearing of the petition.
4. Appellant in appeal no.314/2016 M/s Rajasthan Steel Chambers is an association of steel industries in the State of Rajasthan and was formed by the different industrial units for their welfare and better functioning. This association also had participated in the hearing of the petition before the Commission on behalf of its members.
5. Appellant in appeal no.165/2017 M/s Ambuja Cement Limited has its factory in the Village Rabriyawas Tehsil Jaitaran, District Pali, Rajasthan.
6. Appellant in appeal no.166/2017 M/s J K Cement Works has its factory premises in Kailash Nagar, Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
7. The three distribution companies namely JVVNL, AVVNL and JdVVNL operating in the State of Rajasthan have been impleaded as respondents in these appeals apart from the Commission.
Facts relevant for the disposal of these appeals: -
8. It appears that the three distribution licensees operating in the State of Rajasthan namely JVVNL, AVVNL and JdVVNL had collectively approached the Commission by way of petition no.548/2015 for determination of additional surcharge under Section 42(4) and 39(2)(d) of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Regulation 4(2) and 16 of RERC (Terms and Conditions for Open Access) Regulations, 2004 (in short Open Access Regulations, 2004). In response to the public notices issued by the Commission about the petition inviting objections/comments/suggestions from the persons desirous of submitting the same, 41 organizations/entities including the appellants submitted their comments/suggestions. They also participated in the proceedings of the petition.
9. Upon considering the material before it and on hearing the petitioner as well as the objectors including the appellants, the Commission passed the impugned order dated 24.08.2016 thereby allowing the claim of the distribution licenses for additional surcharge from the open access consumers which was determined as Rs.0.80/unit to be effective from 01.05.2016.
Submissions on behalf of the parties: -
10. We have heard learned counsels appearing for the appellants as well as the learned counsel for the distribution companies. Written submissions filed by the learned counsels have also been perused.
11. The primary argument raised on behalf of the appellants is that the Commission has proceeded on the assumption that additional surcharge under Section 42(4) o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
