Back
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
BALESH KUMAR, Member, RAJESH MALHOTRA, Member
Smt. Anita Bansal – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. provisional attachment of property details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. failure of due process in attachment proceedings. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. allegations involving money laundering and its connection to proceeds of crime. (Para 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. legality of ownership and the right to attach property. (Para 9) |
| 5. court's analytical reasoning regarding attachment under pmla. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. correctness of the exercise of jurisdiction under pmla. (Para 18) |
| 7. dismissal of the appeals. (Para 19) |
FINAL ORDER
05.02.2026
This Order disposes of the Appeal Nos. FPA-PMLA-2315/DLI/2018 filed by Smt. Anita Bansal, FPA-PMLA-2316/DLI/2018 filed by Shri Ravinder Nath Bansal and FPA- PMLA-2306/DLI/2018 filed by Shri Prateek Bansal respectively, against the Order dated 26.03.2018 (Impugned Order) passed by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority (AA) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) in the Original Complaint No. 845/2017 (OC). The Provisional Attachment Order No. 11/2017 dated 06.10.2017 (PAO) issued in ECIR No. ECIR/11/DLZO/2016 dated 30.11.2016 was confirmed vide the Impugned Order.
2. Ld. Counsel for the Appellants submitted that the residential property
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
