SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ATFP) 13055

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
DCIT (BPU-1) Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Newshawk Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. – Respondent


APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI (1) MP-PBPT-82/MUM/2024 (Exem.)

MP-PBPT-81/MUM/2024 (Stay)

FPA-PBPT-27/MUM/2024 DCIT (BPU-1), Mumbai … Appellant Versus M/s. Newshawk Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents (2) MP-PBPT-84/MUM/2024 (Exem.)

MP-PBPT-83/MUM/2024 (Stay)

FPA-PBPT-28/MUM/2024 DCIT (BPU-1), Mumbai … Appellant Versus M/s. Newshawk Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents (3) MP-PBPT-86/MUM/2024 (Exem.)

MP-PBPT-85/MUM/2024 (Stay)

FPA-PBPT-29/MUM/2024 DCIT (BPU-1), Mumbai … Appellant Versus M/s. Newshawk Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared For the Appellant : Mr. Manmeet Singh Arora, S.P.P.

Mr. Camran Iqbal, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ashwani Taneja Ms. Shreya Shandilya Ms. Gunjan Chauhan, Advocates Mr. Ashish Tandon, C.A.

CORAM JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER

FINAL ORDER

15.12.2025 Brief facts:

The present Appeal has been filed against the order dated 27.12.2023 passed by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority (Ld. AA) wherein it was held that no benami transaction could be established between the Respondents. Initiating Officer (IO) was unable to discharge the burden of proof

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top