SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ATFP) 13118

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
Sapna Sureka – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Kolkata – Respondent


FINAL ORDER

10.11.2025

By this appeal under Section 26 under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (in short ‘the Act of 2002), a challenge has been made to the order dated 09.11.2021 passed by the Adjudicating Authority confirming the Provisional Attachment Order dated 31.03.2021.

The learned counsel for the appellant referred to the CBI case registered on 31.03.2014 for the predicate offences against M/s Prakash Vanijya Pvt. Ltd., Mr. Manoj Kumar Jain and others. The appellant was not named as accused though after recording ECIR in reference to the predicate offences, the appellant’s husband was named as an accused. The bank account of the appellant has been provisionally attached in the ignorance of the Income Tax Return (ITR) placed on record showing independent income of the appellant out of salary and other investments, thus, having sources for the aforesaid amount found in the bank account and has been provisionally attached.

The learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the Impugned Order was passed after expiry of 180 days from the date of provisional attachment order and thus should have been declared to have been lapsed as per Section 5(3) of the Act of 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top