SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ATFP) 13344

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
Ms. Addrita Maiti & Smt. Kanika Maiti – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Kolkata – Respondent


ORDER

24.09.2025

These appeals have been preferred to challenge the order dated 25.07.2022 passed by the Adjudicating Authority confirming the Provisional Attachment Order dated 27.09.2021 ( in short ‘PAO’ ).

2. It is a case where an FIR No. 97/2014 was registered by the Belgharia Police Station, Kolkata on a complaint lodged by Shri Goutam Dutta alleging that he had invested a sum of 4,92,606/- with M/s I-Core E Service Ltd. in pursuance to their advertisement. It is with an assurance to return the money with high interest but neither the principal amount nor the interest was paid to the complainant, rather, amount was misappropriated, thus an FIR. Similar FIRs were registered one after another in different police stations.

3. Ld. Counsel for the appellant raised many legal issues for which we are not required to go deep in the facts of the case.

4. Ld. Counsel for the appellant, at the outset, submitted that the Impugned Order passed by the Adjudicating Authority is without application of mind. The compliance of Section 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 ( in short “the Act of 2002” ) has been shown in reference to a company which is different than involved in these

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top