SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ATFP) 13407


APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI
11.FPA-PMLA-6918/RP/2023 Shri Arun Kumar Sahu
22.FPA-PMLA-6919/RP/2023 Shalini Sahu
33.FPA-PMLA-6920/RP/2023 Shri Piyush Kumar Sahu
44.FPA-PMLA-6921/RP/2023 Shri Tushar Sahu
55.FPA-PMLA-6922/RP/2023 Laxmi Sahu
66.FPA-PMLA-6923/RP/2023 Revti Sahu
77.FPA-PMLA-6924/RP/2023 Ranu Sahu
88.FPA-PMLA-6932/RP/2023 Shri Pankaj Kumar Sahu
99.FPA-PMLA-6933/RP/2023 Poonam Sahu … Appellants Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Raipur … Respondent Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared For the Appellant : Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Adv.
Ms. Somiya Gupta, Adv.
For the Respondent : Mr. Abhimanyu Kaul, Adv.
CORAM:
JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI : CHAIRMAN SHRI V. ANANDARAJAN : MEMBER

FINAL ORDER

16.10.2025

FPA-PMLA-6918-6924&6932-6933/RP/2023

The batch of appeals have been preferred under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (in short `the Act of 2002’) to challenge the order dated 09.10.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority confirming the Provisional Attachment Order dated 08.05.2023.

Brief facts of the case:

2. It is a case where an FIR was registered by the Kadugodi Police Station Whitefield, Bangalore on 12.07.2022 for commission of offence under Section 186,204,353 and 120-B IPC against Suryakant Tiwari, a resident of Raipur along with others. The offence under Section 384 IPC was added with the permission of the court vide Addendum dated 03.09.2022.

3. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issued an Office Memorandum (O.M.) on 13.09.2022 titled as “sharing of information with ED in the case of M/s Jai Ambey Group of Raipur (Suryakant Tiwari Group)” based on the report of DGIT, Investigation, Bhopal.

4. As per the O.M., Mr Suryakant Tiwari colluded with Chhattisgarh State Government officials to carry out the offences of large-scale illegal extortion punishable under Section 384 read with 120-B of IPC. The CBDT disclosed the need of Enforcement Directorate to investigate the matter for contravention of Section 3 of the Act of 2002.

5. According to the FIR and the documents received by the Income Tax Department, a search and seizure operation was conducted at the premises of Suryakant Tiwari and his associates. Various evidences in the form of handwritten diaries, papers and digital evidences were collected which revealed cash transaction by a syndicate operated and coordinated by Shri Suryakant Tiwari along with his associates and other individuals. The syndicate was collecting un-authorized cash over and above the legal amount fixed against the Coal Delivery Order to be issued by SECL (South Eastern Coalfields Limited) for various entities carrying out lifting and transportation of coal throughout the State of Chhattisgarh.

6. The syndicate operated by Suryakant Tiwari and his associates were involved in illegal collection of Rs. 25/- for every ton of coal transportation from mines with the active involvement of State Mining Officials/District Officials and Network Agents stationed in the coal belt. The syndicate operated in a well-planned conspiracy for giving coal delivery orders only after illegal payment to the syndicate. Suryakant Tiwari was assisted by the Government official like Smt. Saumya Chaurasia, Deputy Secretary, CMO (Chhattisgarh Administrative Officer), Sameer Vishnoi, Indian Administrative Services Officer and associates like Rajnikant Tiwari, Roshan Singh, Nikhil Chandrakar, Sheikh Moinudeen Qureshi, Hemant Jaiswal, Joginder Singh etc.

7. The collected money was to be distributed amongst the accused and even to settle the bribe money to the Government Officers and politicians to fund election expenditures. The investigation revealed that large portion of money has been channelized into layered transactions to project it as untainted money and brought into the main stream by investing in the properties, coal washeries and other assets.

8. In terms of the permission received from the learned Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, section 384 IPC was added in the FIR but while filing the charge sheet on 08.06.2023, it was not for the offence under Section 384 IPC and thereby cognizance of offence was taken for offence under Section 204 and 353 of IPC only. The ECIR was recorded on 29.09.2022 when the offence under Section 384 IPC was existing with its addition in the FIR though while filing the charge sheet much later on 08.06.2023, it was not filed for the offence under Section 384. However, it was with the endorsement that Suryakant Tiwari and its syndicate are operating in the state of Chhattisgarh thus, the offence under Section 384 IPC be taken up by Chhattisgarh State Police. An FIR was thus registered by the Chhattisgarh State Police on 17.01.2024 vide FI

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top