SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ATFP) 13409

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
M/s Carnoustie Management (India) Pvt. Ltd. Meenakshi Malik Rajesh Malik Randeep Waraich – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement & Ors. – Respondent


ORDER

16.10.2025

The Review Petitions have been filed under Section 35(2)(f) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 ( in short “the Act of 2002”) against the order dated 17.04.2025 passed by this Tribunal dismissing the applications for Condonation of Delay and as a consequence, the appeals.

2. The appeal was filed with a delay of 635 days and accordingly application for Condonation of Delay was filed by the appellants and was dismissed by this Tribunal vide its order dated 17.04.2025 and is sought to be reviewed.

3. Ld. Counsel for the appellants submitted that the delay in filing of the appeal was of 589 days which inadvertently recorded as 625 days in the application for Condonation of Delay and recorded to be of 635 days in the impugned order.

4. The reason for delay was given which was due to filing of a Writ Petition No. 6018/2022 before the High Court of Delhi and the interim order passed on 12.04.2022 to restrain the respondent from further proceedings under Section 8 of the Act of 2002. Despite the restraint order, the Adjudicating Authority passed the order confirming the Provisional Attachment Order despite the interim order in the presence of the respondent, thus Ad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top