SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ATFP) 111

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
The Financial Intelligent Unit Delhi – Appellant
Versus
The Financial Intelligent Unit Delhi – Respondent


APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI Vikramaditya Nagrik Sahakari Bank Maryadit … Appellant Versus The Financial Intelligent Unit, Delhi … Respondent Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared For the Appellant : Mr. Kavindra Solanki, Adv.

Ms. Khushi Sharma, Adv.

For the Respondent : Mr. Satish Aggarwal, Adv.

CORAM JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER

FINAL ORDER

05.02.2026 By this appeal, a challenge has been made to the order dated

09.11.2022 passed by the Directorate FIU imposing a penalty of Rs. 1 lakh, finding failure of the appellant to put in place an effective internal mechanism to deduct and report suspicious transactions reportable as STRs, in violation of Section 12 of the PMLA Act, 2002 read with Rule

7(3) of the PMLA Rules, 2005.

Another penalty of rupees one lakh has been imposed for violation

5(2) and 7(3) of the Rules of 2005. The third penalty of rupees one lakh was imposed for failure of the appellant to identify the ultimate beneficial owner of the trust, legal entities, and similar other customers in violation PMLA Rules, 2005 and Section 12 (1) (d) of the 2002 read with Rules 9 (1) (a) (ii) and 9 (3) of the PMLA Rules, 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top