APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CJ, V. ANANDARAJAN, Member
Shashi Kant Chaurasia – Appellant
Versus
The Initiating Officer, BPU, Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case does not involve benami transaction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments for review focus on illegality of provisional attachments. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. limited grounds for review; lack of error. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. review applications dismissed. (Para 19) |
FINAL ORDER
09.02.2026
Batch of Review Petition have been filed under section 47 of Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act , 1988 (in short, the Act of 1988) against the order dated 14-01-2025 passed by this Tribunal. The orders sought to be reviewed was passed in appeals preferred by the non-applicants challenging the order of Adjudicating Authority confirming the provisional attachment of the property. The Adjudicating Authority found a case of benami transaction. However, the finding recorded by the Authority was challenged by the non- applicant in batch of appeals. After considering the rival submission, this Tribunal allowed the appeals and accordingly the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority was set aside. It was concluded that the case does not involve benami transaction as defined under the Act of 1988 and therefore there was no reason to provisionally atta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.