Back
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
BALESH KUMAR, Member, RAJESH MALHOTRA, Member
Shri Harjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seizure due to possession of drugs. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments against financial investigation validity. (Para 3) |
| 3. evaluation of property purchase and financial sources. (Para 5) |
| 4. partial allowance of appeal and dismissal of construction share. (Para 6) |
FINAL ORDER
12.03.2026
Dictated by: Rajesh Malhotra
The present appeal u/s 68-O of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is filed by the appellants against the impugned order dated 10.01.2024 passed by the Competent Authority, whereby the Freezing Order dated 13.12.2023 passed by the SHO, PS: Lambi, District: Sri Muktsar Sahib, Punjab was confirmed qua the following property:-
| Name of Owner | Description of Properties | Year of Purchase | Value (in Rs.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harjeet Singh | House measuring area of 10570 Sq. ft. situated at Village: Kakhawali, Tehsil: Malout, District: Sri Muktsar Sahib, Punjab. | 2019 | 66,83,700 (Land+House) |
2. As per the facts of the case on 16.03.2023, Police recovered and seized 100 tablets of Etizolam & Escitalopram from the possession of Shri Harjeet Singh, Shri Talwinder Singh @ Mintu and Shri Sewa Singh. Shri Talwinder Singh @ Mintu was also found in possession of 10 grams of Heroin. Accordingly, FIR N
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
