Back
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
Balesh Kumar, Member, Rajesh Malhotra, Member
Balwinder Singh @ Wattan Singh – Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. property freeze order affirmed based on past conviction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellants' arguments on income disregarded. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondent's counterarguments analyzing income evidence. (Para 4) |
| 4. insufficient evidence to overturn freezing order. (Para 5) |
| 5. appeal dismissed with right to provide better evidence. (Para 6) |
FINAL ORDER
12.03.2026
Dictated by: Rajesh Malhotra
The present appeal u/s 68-O of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is filed by the appellants against the order dated 09.05.2024 u/s 68F(2) passed by the Competent Authority, whereby the Freezing Order dated 15.04.2024 passed by the SHO, PS, Bhagapurana, District: Moga, Punjab was confirmed, qua the following properties of the appellants:-
2. As per the facts of the case on 28.08.1996, Punjab Police recovered 40 Kgs. of Poppy Husk from the possession of Shri Balwinder Singh @ Wattan Singh. Accordingly, FIR No. 108 dated 28.08.1996 was registered against him for commission of offence u/s 15 of the NDPS Act, 1985 at PS, Sadar Moga, Punjab. Shri Balwinder Singh was convicted by Special Judge, NDPS Court, Faridkot on 30.07.2002 and was sentenced to undergo Rigours Imprisonment for 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
