SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ATFP) 192

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
Shri G. Sevakumaran & Smt. R. Jayanthi – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Chennai – Respondent


ORDER

12.03.2026

By these appeals filed under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 ( in short “the Act of 2002”), a challenge has been made to the order dated 04.08.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority confirming the Provisional Attachment Order (‘PAO’) dated 23.02.2023.

Brief facts of the case:

2. It is a case where an FIR was registered by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Salem, Tamil Nadu for the offence under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13(1)(e) and Section 13(1)(b) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short the “the Act of 1988”). Shri G. Sevakumaran, appellant, was found to be in possession of the proceeds disproportionate to his known source of income to the tune of Rs.3,31,79,560/-. The appellant joined the Government service as Assistant Engineer sometime in the year 1997 and worked at various places and found to have assets disproportionate to his known source of income. The check-period therein was taken from 01.04.2012 to 31.03.2019. He acquired the assets worth of Rs.2,07,90,330/- during the check-period, while his total income to the tune of Rs.1,17,00,000/- and his total expenditure to the tune of Rs.2,40,89,230/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top