APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
Smt. Sheetal Chandna – Appellant
Versus
The Initiating Officer ACIT Benami Prohibition Unit Kanpur – Respondent
Dictated by: Rajesh Malhotra
The present appeal u/s 46 (2) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, is filed by the appellant against the order u/s 26(3) dated 27.07.2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority in Reference No. R-87/2017, whereby account of the appellant in HDFC Bank Ltd., Ashok Vihar, Phase-II, Delhi, vide account No. 50100136054076 was confirmed for attachment to the extent of Rs. 50,00,000/-, whereas the immovable properties in lieu of said amount were released.
As per the allegations, Deputy Director of Income Tax (Inv.)-II/ Ghaziabad, on 18.01.2017 informed the O/o the Initiating Officer, Benami Prohibition Unit, Kanpur that A/c No. 05190100000698 maintained with J&K Bank, Ghaziabad, pertaining to M/s. Shyama Trading Company, Prop. Shri Ghanshyam Patel had been used for deposit of the de-monetized currency to the extent of Rs.50,00,000/-, which was subsequently transferred to five other accounts, including the account of the present appellant.
Shri Ghanshyam Patel in his statement recorded u/s 134(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 during the course of search on 18.01.2017 informed that the transactions in the said bank account of M/s.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.