SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ATFP) 293

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
Jagdish Kumar M. Gupta – Appellant
Versus
The Initiating Officer BPU-1 Mumbai – Respondent


APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI MP-PBPT-1407/MUM/2024 Exemp.

MP-PBPT-1408/MUM/2024 Stay FPA-PBPT-375/MUM/2024 Jagdish Kumar M. Gupta … Appellant Versus The Initiating Officer, BPU-1 Mumbai … Respondent Advocates / Authorized Representatives who appeared:

For the Appellant(s) : Counsel appeared For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Manmeet S. Arora, S.P.P.

CORAM JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI : CHAIRMAN MR. V. ANANDARAJAN : MEMBER

ORDER

08.04.2026 This appeal has been filed to challenge the order dated

11.09.2024 passed by the Adjudicating Authority confirming the Provisional Attachment Order (“PAO”) while answering the reference.

Arguments of the Ld. Counsel for the appellant:

2. Ld. Counsel for the appellant made a reference of the facts to the case for challenge to the order alleging it to be not involving benami transaction. It was submitted that the appellant proposed to purchase flats in a building to be constructed in the name of ‘Prathamesh Galaxy’. The developer, namely, M/s Sailee Developers issued allotment letters on 24.07.2002 and 26.01.2003 in the name of the appellant confirming and reserving four flats on different floors. The amount of consideration was paid and menti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top