SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ATFP) 330

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY
Jitendra Mohanlal Katarmal – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Mumbai – Respondent


By this appeal, a challenge has been made to the order dated 14.10.2025 passed by the Adjudicating Authority confirming the Provisional Attachment Order (“PAO”) dated 10.05.2024.

Brief facts of the case:

2. The provisional attachment of the property was caused after recording of the ECIR and initiation of investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 ( in short “the Act of 2002”). The ECIR was recorded on registration of FIR dated 20.03.2015 at Santacruz Police Station for the offences under Section 34, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC”). It was based on the complaint of Mr. Mahesh J Pariyani against Mr. Kiran Peswani, Mr. Gopal Thakur, Mr. Hasmukh Thakur and Mr. Roshan Sheth. It was alleged that the accused with the intention to deceive , gained Mr. Pariyani’s trust and induced him to buy a flat in a Monarch Group project, promoting him to pay Rs. 7 Crores. To make the transactions appear legitimate, they provided allotment letter, an agreement for sale, an irrevocable power of attorney, a possession letter and a no-lien letter. However, the flat was sold to another person.

3. The other FIR was registered on 27.10.2016 at Naupada Police Station f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top