SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 704

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
ASWINI JITENDRA KABLE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPT. – Respondent
PILL/14887/2024



2024:BHC-OS:10583-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 61 OF 2024 Akhil Bharatiya Samajwadi Digitally signed by BASAVRAJ Adhyapak Sabha & Ors. .. Petitioners BASAVRAJ GURAPPA GURAPPA PATIL Versus PATIL Date:

2024.07.19 State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents

15:03:30 +0530 WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.87 OF 2024 [transferred from Nagpur Bench bearing PIL/17/2024]

Vaibhav Vyankatrao Kamble & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents ALONG WITH ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 14887 OF 2024 Aswini Jitendra Kamble .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3317 OF 2024 Shabbir Gulamgaus Deshmukh .. Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 15520 OF 2024 Vidhayak Bharti .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate with Ms. Devyani Kulkarni and Ms. Sanskruti Yagnik for petitioners in PIL/61/2024.

Ms. Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate with Ms. Payal Gaikwad, Mr. Deepak Chatap, Mr. Raj Kamble and Ms. Vasudha Chandwani for petitioner in PIL(L)/14887/2024.

Ms. Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shreya Mohapatra and Sanjot Shirsath for petitioner in WP/3317/2024.

Mr. Swanand Ganoo with Mr. Tejas S. Bhide for petitioner in PIL (L)/15520/2024.

Ms. Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepak Chatap, Mr. Rushikesh Bhoyar for petitioners in PIL/87/2024.

Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Additional GP with Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl. G.P., Ms. G. R. Raghuwanshi, A.G.P. for State – respondent in PIL/61/2024.

Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader with Mr. O. A.

Chandurkar, Additional GP for respondent in PIL No.87 of 2024 Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Addl. G.P. with Smt. Rita Joshi, A.G.P. for the State–respondent in PIL(L)/14887/2024, PIL(L)/15520/2024 and WP/3317/2024.

Mr. Arvind G. Kothari with Ms. Manisha Mane – Bhangale, Ms. Brijal Vora and Mr. Akshay Arora i/b. Parinam Law Associates for respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in PIL/61/2024.

Mr. Arvind Kothari for respondent Nos.6, 7, 18 and 19 in PIL/61/2024.

Mr. Nilesh Patil with Ms. Shraddha Pawar i/by Team Justice League for respondent Nos. 8 to 12 in PIL/61/ 2024.

Mr. Pritesh Burad with Mrs. Madhuri Gamare i/by Pritesh Burad Associates for respondent No. 17 in PIL/61/2024.

Mr. Chaitanya Nikte with Mr. Swapnil Sangle i/by Mr. Prajit S.

Sahane for respondent No. 21 in PIL/61/2024.

Ms. Leena Patil for respondent No. 1-(UOI) in WP/3317/2024.

Mr. Ashutosh Mishra for respondent No.3–(UOI) in PIL(L)/15520/2024.

Dr. Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikram Trivedi, Ms. Suchitra Valjee, Mr. Varun Nathani, Mr. Himalaya Chaudhary, Ms. Rajvi Shah, Ms. Riyas Vasa i/by Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for respondent No.4 in PIL(L)/14887/2024.

Mr. Sharad Gosavi – Director of Primary Education, Pune is present.

Mr. Ramdas Dhumal – Desk Officer (Education) Mantralaya, Mumbai is present.

CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. &

AMIT BORKAR, J.

RESERVED ON : 11th JULY, 2024 PRONOUNCED ON : 19th JULY, 2024 JUDGMENT (PER : CHIEF JUSTICE)

(A) CHALLENGE:

1. By instituting these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, some of which are PIL petitions, challenge has been made to the Maharashtra Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (Amendment) Rules, 2024 (hereinafter referred to as the Amendment Rules) whereby after Rule 4(5) of the Maharashtra Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the Principal Rules), a proviso has been added which provides that the Local Authority shall not identify the private unaided schools where Government schools and aided schools are situated within a radius of 1 km of that school, for the purpose of providing 25 per cent admission to the children belonging to disadvantaged groups and weaker sections under the Maharashtra Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (Manner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top