Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
KISHORE C. SANT, J
DEEPAK LAXMAN SHINDE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant challenges conviction (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. prosecution case summary (Para 2) |
| 3. defense claims false implication (Para 12) |
| 4. submissions by appellant (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. judgments relied upon (Para 16 , 17) |
| 6. submissions by the state (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. discussion on evidence (Para 22) |
| 8. court's findings on evidence (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 9. appeal dismissed (Para 27) |
JUDGMENT
1. The appellant is before this Court challenging the judgment and order dated 14.12.2004, passed by the learned Special Judge, Ahmednagar, in Special Case No. 10 of 1998. The appellant is held guilty of the offences punishable under Section 7 , 13 (1) (d) r/w 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and is sentenced to suffer R.I. for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default to suffer R.I. for 6 months for each of the offences. The sentences are directed to run concurrently.
2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the appellant at the relevant time was working as Junior Engineer with the then M.S.E.B. at Karjat, District Ahmednagar. The informant Gautam Dagadu Shelke approached Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB) on 09.02.1998 and lo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
