SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 1049

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J
SHRI. NARAYAN DAMODAR THAKUR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
SHRI. MADANLAL MOHANLAL MALPANI – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1) Applicants have filed this Revision Application challenging the decree dated 21 March 2024 passed by the District Judge-II, Panvel Raigad dismissing Regular Civil Appeal No. 189 of 2019 and confirming the decree dated 9 July 2013 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division, Panvel in Regular Civil Suit No. 51 of 2005. The Trial Court has decreed the suit filed by Respondent-Plaintiff and has directed the Applicants-Defendants to handover possession of the suit premises and to pay arrears of rent of Rs.11,928/-. An enquiry into mesne profits under Order 20 Rule 12 of the Civil Procedure Code , 1908 is also directed to be conducted.

2) Facts of the case, as pleaded in the Plaint, are that Plaintiff is the owner of final Plot No. 233 and building constructed thereon, named ‘Indu Smruti’ within the limits of Panvel Municipal Corporation. Shop No. 1 situated on ground floor of the building admeasuring 14 ft x 9 ft are the suit premises in which the First Defendant was inducted as monthly tenant on rent of Rs.300/- plus taxes of Rs.111/- [total Rs.411/-]. That the suit premises are let out to the First Defendant vide Agreements dated 13 April 1981 and 15 February 1996 for oper

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top