SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6663

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. CHANDURKARHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN
SMT.RADHABAI B.SHIRKE – Appellant
Versus
SHRI. KESHAV R. JADHAV – Respondent


JUDGMENT

 : ( Per Jitendra Jain, J. )

1. In Second Appeal No.593 of 1987, the following substantial question of law arose for consideration :

“Whether a daughter could acquire any right, either limited or absolute, by inheritance prior to coming into force of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 in the property of her deceased father, who died prior to 1956, leaving behind him in addition to such daughter, his widow as well?”

2. The facts giving rise to the aforesaid substantial question of law are that one Yeshwantrao had two wives, Laxmibai and Bhikubai – Yeshwantrao had two daughters from Laxmibai, namely Sonubai and Radhabai. From his marriage with Bhikubai, he had a daughter, Champubai. Laxmibai pre-deceased her husband in 1930. Sonubai expired in 1949 while Yeshwantrao expired on 10th June 1952. Bhikubai expired on 8th July 1973 after executing a will in favour of her daughter Champubai on 14th August 1956. Radhabai, the daughter from the first marriage of Yeshwantrao filed suit for declaration that she had half share in the properties left behind by her father and sought partition of the same. The trial Court dismissed the suit holding that Bhikubai alone inherited the suit properties

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top