Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Milind N. Jadhav, J
Rakesh Matasharan Shukla – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case revolves around the applicant's actions leading to the complainant's injury. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. defense challenges the evidence and credibility of witnesses. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court evaluates both sides' arguments within the context of ipc sections. (Para 10 , 12 , 19) |
| 4. court upholds convictions for rash driving while quashing stalking charges. (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. sentence modified to time served, applicant released. (Para 20 , 21 , 26) |
1. Heard Mr. Patel, learned Advocate for the Revision Applicant and Ms. Phad, Learned APP for the State.
2. Considering the incarceration of the Revision Applicant in jail since 06.09.2024 and the request made by Mr. Patel citing exigency in view of the sentence being awarded of rigorous imprisonment for three months by the District Court, the Revision Application and Interim Application are heard finally.
3. Applicant is convicted under Section 248(2) of Cr.P.C. for offences punishable under Sections 279 , 354D and 337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “ IPC ”). He is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of three months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- for offence punishable under Section 354D ; rigorous i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
