SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 556

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
R.I. CHAGLA, J
DAIWA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
DAIWA PHARMACEUTICALS PVT LTD AND ORS – Respondent


O R A L O R D E R :

1. By this Interim Application, the Applicant / Plaintiff is seeking an order of injunction restraining Defendant No. 1 by itself and through its affiliates, directors, employees, agents, distributors, retailers, dealers, manufacturers, stockists and / or otherwise from using in any manner the impugned trademarks 'Daiwa Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd', 'Daiwa Pharma', and / or ‘ ’ and / or impugned domain name and/or any other word or mark, device or expression or symbol which is/are identical with and / or deceptively and/or confusingly similar to, in any manner whatsoever, the Applicant's said mark 'DAIWA', or the Applicant's other marks comprising DAIWA as their essential and prominent feature as so to pass-off its impugned identical and/or similar goods i.e. pharmaceuticals and medicinal preparations as and for that of the Applicant.

2. Further, ancillary relief is sought including in prayer Clause (d) which is to restrain Defendant No.1 from offering goods through the impugned domain name and from transferring or alienating in any manner dealing with the impugned domain name.

It would be necessary to refer to relevant facts which have led to be filing of the above S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top