HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MANGESH S. PATIL, SHAILESH P, JJ
DR. REKHA W/O. GOWARDHAN GAIKWAD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP/1401/2021
RESERVED ON : 06.05.2024 PRONOUNCED ON: 11.06.2024 JUDGMENT (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) :
2. Shorn of the verbiage, the circumstances leading to the filing of this writ petition are to the effect that the petitioner has been serving as a Medical Officer Class – I and on the date of petition was posted in the office of Health and Family Welfare and Training Centre, Aurangabad. Respondent No.9 is the superior officer, whereas, respondent No.7 was her colleague and respondent No.8 was also serving in the same establishment as an Administrative Officer and were allegedly aware that she belonged to a scheduled caste ‘Mahar’. Respondent No.9 allegedly subjected her to humiliation and also used to make overtures since 03.06.2016. She approached Vedant Nagar Police Station and lodged a detailed complaint on 29.01.2019. Since initially it was not accepted she had to approach the Commissioner of Police and thereafter her complaint was received and Crime No.40/2019 was registered for the offences punishable under Section 506 and 509 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and for the offence punishable under Section 3 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (herein after the Atrocities Act) against respondents No.7 to 9.
3. Since the Investigating Officer was not filing any final report, the petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.402/2020 seeking a direction for filing the report. Simultaneously, respondent Nos.7 to 9 filed separate applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashment of the crime.
4. It transpires that the Investigating Officer solicited sanction to prosecute respondents No.7 to 9, in the light of Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure . It was pointed out to this Court that pursuant to such requisition by the Investigating Officer, by communication dated 17.02.2021, which is under challenge in this Writ Petition, the Investigating Officer was informed by the Under Secretary in the Public Health Department of the State that the competent authority (Hon’ble Chief Minister) had refused to accord sanction for the time being. In view of such supervening event in view of the stand of the State and the Investigating Officer pointing out his inability to file a final report/charge-sheet, by the common order dated 23.08.2021, the criminal applications of respondents No.7 to 9 for quashment were disposed of granting them liberty to again apply for quashment if the charge-sheet was filed, in case the decision refusing to accord sanction was set aside. To this later stage, by recording the submission of the learned Senior advocate for the petitioner in respect of Writ Petition No.402/2020, informing that the petitioner was still to decide if to challenge the order/decision refusing to accord a sanction, and by observing that the petitioner could challenge that decision, even that writ petition was disposed of.
5. The present petition has been preferred with following prayers :
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.