HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE URMILA SACHIN JOSHI- PHALKE
PRAHARSH CORPORATION PVT. LTD. FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRAHARSH INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD. MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
INTERNATIONAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD. NEW DELHI AND CORPORATE OFFICE AT MUMBAI AND ORS – Respondent
.
Heard learned Senior Counsel Shri M.G.Bhangde for Praharsh Corporation Private Limited (applicant in Civil Revision Application No./0 and non-applicant No. in Civil Revision Application No./0); learned counsel Dr.
(Shri) Anjan De for International Asset Reconstruction .....5/- Company Private Limited and Madhav Vidarbha Estate Pvt.
Limited (non-applicant Nos. and in both Civil Revision Applications), and learned counsel Shri S.V.Purohit for Mr.
Sawan Nandkumar Bhatewara (applicant No. in Civil Revision Application No./0 and applicant in Civil Revision Application No./0).
. Rule.
.
By these Civil Revision Applications, applicants have challenged order dated ..0 passed below Exhibits-0 and by learned th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Nagpur in Special Civil Suit No.0/0 whereby the said applications under Order VII Rule of the Code of Civil Procedure have been rejected.
.
Relevant facts necessary for disposal of civil revision applications are as under:Non-applicant No.1 – International Asset Reconstruction Company Private Limited (hereinafter .....6/- referred to as “IARCPL”) and non-applicant No. - Madhav Vidarbha Estate Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as “MVEPL”), or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.