SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 2647

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Ravindra V. Ghuge, Y. G. Khobragade, JJ
SAMIKSHA RAMAKANT CHANDRAKAR AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS – Respondent


Shri Atul Rajadhyaksha, Senior Advocate a/w Shri Akhilesh Dubey, Shri Uttam Dubey, Shri Amit Dubey, Shri Krishna P. Rodge, Shri Rajuram Kuleriya i/by Law Counsellors, Advocate for the Petitioners in Writ Petition No.12699/2022. Shri Akhilesh Dubey, Advocate a/w Shri Jiwan J. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners in Writ Petition No.12675/2022. Shri V.D. Sapkal, Senior Advocate a/w Shri Ujwal S. Patil and Shri Bhalchandra Shinde, Advocates for the Petitioners in Writ Petition Nos.9632/2022 and 9631/2022. Shri Ajay Deshpande, Shri Swapnil Joshi, Shri Sameer Kurundkar and Shri Sandip Kulkarni, Advocates for the Petitioners in Writ Petition No.9163/2022. Shri Ram S. Apte, Senior Advocate, Special Counsel a/w Shri S.K. Tambe, AGP, for the Petitioners/ State of Maharashtra in Writ Petition No.11692/2022 and Writ Petition No.11762/2022. Shri P.R. Katneshwarkar, Special Counsel a/w Shri S.K. Tambe, AGP, for the Respondents/ State in Writ Petition Nos.9163/2022, 12699/2022, 12675/2022, 9631/2022 and 9632/2022. Shri Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate a/w Shri P.P. More, Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 and 10 in Writ Petition No.9163/2022. Shri Sushant Dixit, Advocate a/w Shri Pandurang Gaikwad, Advocate for Respondent No.6 in Writ Petition No.9163/2022, for Respondent No.8 in Writ Petition No.9632/2022 and Respondent Nos.7 to 9 in Writ Petition No.9631/2022. Shri V.D. Sapkal, Senior Advocate a/w Shri Bhalchandra Shinde and Shri Ujwal S. Patil, Advocates for the Respondent Nos.6 to 9 in Writ Petition No.9163/2022, for Respondent Nos.3 to 8 in Writ Petition No.11692/2022 and for Respondent No.3 in Writ Petition No.11762/2022. Shri Avinash S. Deshmukh a/w Shri S.G. Joshi, Advocates for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 in Writ Petition No.9632/2022 and for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in Writ Petition No.11692/2022.

ORDER

1. Both these miscellaneous applications are allowed.

2. The operative part of the order dated 9.1.2004 in O.A. No. 763 of 2003 is modified and shall read as follows:

"The respondent no. 1 is directed to finalize the seniority list of Dy. Collectors determining the inter-se seniority among promotee Dy. Collectors and direct recruit Dy. Collectors on the basis of relevant rules and also after deciding the objections raised by the applicants to the provisional seniority list within a period of six months from today. The respondent no. 1, however is at liberty to make selection for promotion on the basis of the provisional seniority list subject to condition that 32 promotions given on the basis of such selection shall be subject to the inter-se gradation in the final seniority list. O.A. is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs".

3. Additional time of six months is granted to the applicant from today for implementing the order dated 9.1.2004, passed in O.A. No. 763 of 2003.

4. No order as to costs.”

17. The above orders were challenged in Writ Petition No.7851/2004 (Jotiba T. Patil and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and others), (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Mumbai) and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top