HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
VITTHAL RAMRAO MUTE – Appellant
Versus
SUGANDHA KESHAVRAO SATONE AND OTHERS – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
1.This appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree J-sa361.22.odt 3/7 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.201 of 2015 dated 28.02.2022, by Ad-hoc District Judge-2, Wardha, which was filed against the judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No.70 of 2009.
2.Brief facts of the case are as under : The respondent No.1 filed suit against respondents except respondent No.10 for partition. The suit was decreed. The appeal was preferred by third party the appellant. He is claiming that he is owner of Survey No.365, village mouza Waigaon (Nipani) District Wardha which is subject matter of suit. The appeal was dismissed and it was held that appellant failed to prove his right in the suit property Survey No.365.
3.Learned Advocate for the appellant submitted that the name of appellant appearing in the revenue record i.e. 7/12 extract of Survey No.365 as per mutation entry No.1480 which was effected in the year 2011. It is not challenged till today by the respondents. Other old revenue record and entries in it are also pointed out. The appellant submitted that all the documents were filed in view of the directions of this Court by order dated 15th March, 2024. The valuabl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.