Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J
Jibhau Sukhdev Deore – Appellant
Versus
Vishwas Ramchandra Dighavkar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and area discrepancies in land records. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments centering around procedural adherence and limitations. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. clarification of section applicability and time limits. (Para 12 , 15) |
| 4. the court findings on time-barred proceedings. (Para 14 , 16) |
| 5. final ruling and dismissal of the petition. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT:
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and with the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, Petition is taken up for hearing.
2. By this petition, Petitioners challenge Order dated 17th July 2019 passed by the Minister-Revenue in rejecting the Revision Application. Petitioners had preferred the Revision challenging the Order dated 19th May 2016 passed by Deputy Director of Land Records, Nashik Region, Nashik, by which the appeal of Respondents was allowed and order passed by the District Superintendent of Land Records, Nashik dated 14.10.2015 came to be set aside. By his Order dated 14.10.2015, the District Superintendent of Land Records had rejected Petitioners’ appeal filed under Section 31A of the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Land Holdings Act, 1947 (Fragmentation Act) for cor
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
