HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J
Jibhau Sukhdev Deore – Appellant
Versus
Vishwas Ramchandra Dighavkar – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and with the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, Petition is taken up for hearing.
2. By this petition, Petitioners challenge Order dated 17th July 2019 passed by the Minister-Revenue in rejecting the Revision Application. Petitioners had preferred the Revision challenging the Order dated 19th May 2016 passed by Deputy Director of Land Records, Nashik Region, Nashik, by which the appeal of Respondents was allowed and order passed by the District Superintendent of Land Records, Nashik dated 14.10.2015 came to be set aside. By his Order dated 14.10.2015, the District Superintendent of Land Records had rejected Petitioners’ appeal filed under Section 31A of the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Land Holdings Act, 1947 (Fragmentation Act) for correction of clerical and arithmetical mistakes in the Consolidation Scheme finalized on 15.11.1964.
3. Considering the narrow controversy involved in the present petition, it is not necessary to record facts in detail.
Suffice it to state that one Sukhdeo Motiram Deore owned Land bearing Survey No.205 admeasuring area of 19 Acre 4 Gunthas. Said Sukhdeo Motira
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.