Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J
M/s. Nanded City Development and Construction Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Laxman Eknath Dedge and Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court accepted case for hearing based on consent. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. disputes stemmed from allotment requests amid joint development agreement. (Para 4 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. appellant asserts fulfillment of obligations, while respondents claim possession. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. balance of convenience favors plaintiff over defendants. (Para 20 , 22) |
| 5. trial court's errors led to reversal of decision favoring plaintiff. (Para 23 , 24) |
1.Admit. With the consent of the learned counsels appearing for parties, the appeal is taken up for hearing.
2.This Appeal is fled challenging order dated 3 October 2022 passed by the 11th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune rejecting Appellant-Plaintiff’s application at Exibit-5 for grant of temporary injunction and allowing application fled by the Respondents-Defendants at Exhibit-34 granting temporary injunction in favour of the Defendants by restraining Plaintiff from obstructing Defendants’ possession of the suit property.
3.The Appellant-Plaintiff is carrying out a phasewise development of large land parcel admeasuring 274.6977 hectares in Village-Nanded and 4.5847 hectares in Village- Khadakwasla, Taluka-Haveli, District-Pune in pursuanc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
