HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MANISH PITALE, J
Ramchandra Udaysinh Jadhavrao – Appellant
Versus
Girishnavnathrao Avhad and another – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of appeal and parties involved. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments on jurisdiction under section 34. (Para 2 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. court's finding on termination of arbitration. (Para 7 , 8 , 17 , 21) |
| 4. grounds for the district court's order. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. reference to relevant case law. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. distinction between awards and orders. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. legal interpretation of section 32. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. legal precedents on arbitral awards. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
ORDER :
2. The learned counsel for the parties have made submissions with regard to the scope of jurisdiction under Section 34 of the said Act, in the backdrop of the aspect of termination of arbitral proceedings under Section 32 thereof, with particular reference to the concept of termination of mandate of the arbitrator touching upon Sections 14 and 15 of the said Act. The learned counsel for the parties have referred to various judgements in the said context pertaining to termination of the mandate of an arbitrator, as opposed to the termination of the arbitral proceedings themselves, which has become a bone of contention between the parties. This Court is call
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.